These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8480698)

  • 1. Craniofacial morphometry by photographic evaluations.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Apr; 103(4):327-37. PubMed ID: 8480698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lip posture following debonding of labial appliances based on conventional profile photographs.
    Abed Y; Har-Zion G; Redlich M
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 19216600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults.
    Malkoç S; Demir A; Uysal T; Canbuldu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 19064675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
    Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Holdaway measurement norms in Turkish adults.
    Sahin Sağlam AM
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):757-62. PubMed ID: 12553619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural head position and inclination of craniofacial planes.
    Petricevic N; Celebic A; Celic R; Baucic-Bozic M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 16752626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vertical photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profiles of two different racial groups: a comparative study.
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):443-57. PubMed ID: 25457394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do the neoclassical canons still describe the beauty of faces? An anthropometric study on 50 Caucasian models.
    Torsello F; Mirigliani L; D'Alessio R; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 20529624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of chinese faces and its application in evaluating facial deformity.
    Dong Y; Zhao Y; Bai S; Wu G; Zhou L; Wang B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1195-206. PubMed ID: 21050632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrospective evaluation of facial soft tissue cephalometric parameters in adolescents with normal occlusion.
    Poosti M; Ramezanzadeh B; Salehi T; Rashed R
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(2):15-8. PubMed ID: 20687311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in esthetic standards since 1940.
    Berneburg M; Dietz K; Niederle C; Göz G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):450.e1-9; discussion 450-1. PubMed ID: 20362894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head posture and cephalometric analyses: an integrated photographic/radiographic technique.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Germanò D; Dalloca LL; Miani A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 8074090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial anthropometry in newborns in Pondicherry.
    Shah M; Verma IC; Mahadevan S; Puri RK
    Indian J Pediatr; 1991; 58(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 1879908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of some facial anthropometric parameters in an Iranian population: infancy through adolescence.
    Jahanbin A; Rashed R; Yazdani R; Shahri NM; Kianifar H
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):941-5. PubMed ID: 23714916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Sudanese female face: normative craniofacial measurements and comparison with African-American and North American White females.
    Salah M; Higzi MA; Ali RW; Naini FB
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1704-9. PubMed ID: 25012648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orientation of craniofacial planes and temporomandibular disorder in young adults with normal occlusion.
    Ciancaglini R; Colombo-Bolla G; Gherlone EF; Radaelli G
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Sep; 30(9):878-86. PubMed ID: 12950968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.