These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. NBLDA: negative binomial linear discriminant analysis for RNA-Seq data. Dong K; Zhao H; Tong T; Wan X BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):369. PubMed ID: 27623864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The fitting of the positive binomial distribution when both parameters are estimated from the sample. BINET FE Ann Eugen; 1953 Sep; 18(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 13092733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconsideration of the binomial and F distribution relationship as a test for nonrandomness of chromosomal breakage. Dahm PF; Greenbaum IF Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1994; 66(3):214-5. PubMed ID: 8125020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Weighted nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate of a mixing distribution in nonrandomized clinical trials. Liu C; Xie J; Zhang Y Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(29):5303-19. PubMed ID: 17497612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The immunoglobulin content in the saliva of children living under different radioecological conditions]. Mel'nichenko EM; Kushner AN; Zafranskaia MM; Miliutin AA Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1999; 78(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 10224900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnosis of oral premalignant and malignant lesions using cytomorphometry. Ramaesh T; Mendis BR; Ratnatunga N; Thattil RO Odontostomatol Trop; 1999 Mar; 22(85):23-8. PubMed ID: 11372099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical analysis for dependent dichotomous data. Drane JW; Postelnicu T; Ursianu E Rom J Intern Med; 1997; 35(1-4):121-31. PubMed ID: 9562661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inverse binomial sampling as a basis for estimating negative binomial population densities. Gerrard DJ; Cook RD Biometrics; 1972 Dec; 28(4):971-80. PubMed ID: 4567637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On predicting abundance from occupancy. Solow AR; Smith WK Am Nat; 2010 Jul; 176(1):96-8. PubMed ID: 20465423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the binomial distribution to predict impairment: application in a nonclinical sample. Axelrod BN; Wall JR; Estes BW Appl Neuropsychol; 2008; 15(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 18726737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing the homogeneity of correlated variances from a bivariate normal distribution. Lucke JF Nurs Res; 1994; 43(5):314-5. PubMed ID: 7937179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs. A'Hern RP Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):859-66. PubMed ID: 11252008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conditional and exact tests in crossover trials. Patefield M J Biopharm Stat; 2000 Feb; 10(1):109-29. PubMed ID: 10709805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Some results on combinations of two binary screening tests. Lin SC J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Mar; 9(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 10091911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A methodology to design heuristics for model selection based on the characteristics of data: Application to investigate when the Negative Binomial Lindley (NB-L) is preferred over the Negative Binomial (NB). Shirazi M; Dhavala SS; Lord D; Geedipally SR Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():186-194. PubMed ID: 28886410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]