These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [Physical diagnostic procedures: whispered speech and tuning fork test]. Grote JJ; de Laat JA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1998 Aug; 142(32):1816-9. PubMed ID: 9856153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The tuning fork--an essential instrument in otologic practice. Doyle PJ; Anderson DW; Pijl S J Otolaryngol; 1984 Apr; 13(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6726852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of conductive hearing loss on auditory function. Katz J ASHA; 1978 Oct; 20(10):879-86. PubMed ID: 718733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The gaps-in-noise test: gap detection thresholds in normal-hearing young adults. Samelli AG; Schochat E Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):238-45. PubMed ID: 18465408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of velocity distortion product otoacoustic emissions for estimating mechanically based hearing loss. Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Müller M; Zenner HP; Gummer AW Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):17-28. PubMed ID: 19233253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort. Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Auditory steady-state responses to bone conduction stimuli in children with hearing loss. Swanepoel de W; Ebrahim S; Friedland P; Swanepoel A; Pottas L Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 72(12):1861-71. PubMed ID: 18963045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new modification of the Rinne test. Johnston DF Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1992 Aug; 17(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 1526051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of impacted cerumen in hearing loss. Subha ST; Raman R Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Oct; 85(10):650, 652-3. PubMed ID: 17124935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive value of intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked responses in surgery for conductive hearing losses. Selesnick SH; Victor JD; Tikoo RK; Eisenman DJ Am J Otol; 1997 Jan; 18(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 8989945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The application of the same frequency tone masking test in forensic identification]. Liu JH; Xu JT; Li YF Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 May; 21(2):81-3. PubMed ID: 15931742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of hearing loss after failed neonatal hearing screening. Holster IL; Hoeve LJ; Wieringa MH; Willis-Lorrier RM; de Gier HH J Pediatr; 2009 Nov; 155(5):646-50. PubMed ID: 19616786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Studies on qualitative speech recognition, sound recognition and auditory threshold]. Müller K Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1978; 30(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 730095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Audiologic results in patients with Moebiüs sequence. Griz S; Cabral M; Azevedo G; Ventura L Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 71(9):1457-63. PubMed ID: 17640740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions. Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):669-81. PubMed ID: 17804981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]