101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8482622)
1. The investigation and rectification of field placement errors in the delivery of complex head and neck fields.
Dunscombe PB; Fox K; Loose S; Leszczynski K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1993 Apr; 26(1):155-61. PubMed ID: 8482622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy in radiation field alignment in head and neck cancer: a prospective study.
Huizenga H; Levendag PC; De Porre PM; Visser AG
Radiother Oncol; 1988 Feb; 11(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 3353522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method for the measurement of field placement errors in digital portal images.
Meertens H; Bijhold J; Strackee J
Phys Med Biol; 1990 Mar; 35(3):299-323. PubMed ID: 2320664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Portal imaging protocol for radical dose-escalated radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer.
Mubata CD; Bidmead AM; Ellingham LM; Thompson V; Dearnaley DP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jan; 40(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 9422580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A methodology to determine margins by EPID measurements of patient setup variation and motion as applied to immobilization devices.
Prisciandaro JI; Frechette CM; Herman MG; Brown PD; Garces YI; Foote RL
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2978-88. PubMed ID: 15587650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A dynamic supraclavicular field-matching technique for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT.
Duan J; Shen S; Spencer SA; Ahmed RS; Popple RA; Ye SJ; Brezovich IA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):959-72. PubMed ID: 15465215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A double exposed portal image comparison between electronic portal imaging hard copies and port films in radiation therapy treatment setup confirmation to determine its clinical application in a radiotherapy center.
Hatherly KE; Smylie JC; Rodger A; Dally MJ; Davis SR; Millar JL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Jan; 49(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 11163514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A proposal for the classification of field placement errors in radiotherapy.
Dunscombe PB; Fox K; Ryder S
Med Dosim; 1991 Mar; 16(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2043246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric assessment of the field abutment region in head and neck treatments using a multileaf collimator.
Abdel-Hakim K; Nishimura T; Takaih M; Suzuki S; Sakahara H
Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 May; 179(5):312-9. PubMed ID: 12740658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is weekly port filming adequate for verifying patient position in modern radiation therapy?
Valicenti RK; Michalski JM; Bosch WR; Gerber R; Graham MV; Cheng A; Purdy JA; Perez CA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Sep; 30(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 7928470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial clinical experience with a video-based patient positioning system.
Johnson LS; Milliken BD; Hadley SW; Pelizzari CA; Haraf DJ; Chen GT
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Aug; 45(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 10477025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A polygon matching algorithm and its applications to verification of radiation field placement in radiotherapy.
Leszczynski K; Loose S
Int J Biomed Comput; 1995 Sep; 40(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 8557406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biteblock-head immobilizer system.
Nelson TJ; Lindberg RD
Med Dosim; 1989 Sep; 14(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 2690851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective clinical evaluation of an electronic portal imaging device.
Michalski JM; Graham MV; Bosch WR; Wong J; Gerber RL; Cheng A; Tinger A; Valicenti RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Mar; 34(4):943-51. PubMed ID: 8598374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of a customised immobilisation system for head and neck IMRT using electronic portal imaging.
Humphreys M; Guerrero Urbano MT; Mubata C; Miles E; Harrington KJ; Bidmead M; Nutting CM
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Oct; 77(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16154217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved methods for determination of variability in patient positioning for radiation therapy using simulation and serial portal film measurements.
Rosenthal SA; Galvin JM; Goldwein JW; Smith AR; Blitzer PH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1992; 23(3):621-5. PubMed ID: 1612962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monte Carlo evaluation of tissue inhomogeneity effects in the treatment of the head and neck.
Wang L; Yorke E; Chui CS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Aug; 50(5):1339-49. PubMed ID: 11483347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Matching IMRT fields with static photon field in the treatment of head-and-neck cancer.
Li JG; Liu C; Kim S; Amdur RJ; Palta JR
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(3):135-8. PubMed ID: 16112462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative evaluation of two head and neck immobilization devices using electronic portal imaging.
Donato K; Leszczynski K; Fleming K
Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):158-61. PubMed ID: 16489197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An algorithm to assess the need for clinical Monte Carlo dose calculation for small proton therapy fields based on quantification of tissue heterogeneity.
Bueno M; Paganetti H; Duch MA; Schuemann J
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081704. PubMed ID: 23927301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
