These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8482782)

  • 41. The influence of modified cavity design and finishing techniques on the margin region of amalgam restorations: a simulated clinical study.
    Bryant RW
    Aust Prosthodont J; 1992; 6():39-45. PubMed ID: 1300132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Surface treatment of mercury-free alloys.
    Geiger SB; Gurbatov D; Dariel MP; Eichmiller FC; Liberman R; Ratzker M
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10483447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Scanning electron microscopical study of differently worked amalgam fillings].
    Fritz U
    Quintessenz; 1989 Oct; 40(10):1875-80. PubMed ID: 2639990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Polishing dental amalgam restorations.
    de Vries J; de Wet FA; Eick JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Aug; 58(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 3476725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Optimizing marginal fit of amalgam restorations on the cervico-interproximal aspect].
    Hannig M; Lauffs HJ; Albers HK
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jul; 44(7):548-51. PubMed ID: 2630287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of the polishing technique at low or high speed on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam.
    Pedigoni Mde L; Centola AL; Froner IC; Turbino ML; Ribeiro SA
    Braz Dent J; 1991; 2(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1819356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Marginal failure of amalgam. Effect of alloy selection and bite forces.
    Dérand T
    Swed Dent J; 1983; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 6576493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Occlusal preparations in amalgam: a rational approach to finishing].
    Roth F
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1984 Dec; 38(148):653-68. PubMed ID: 6599374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effects of sealers and liners on marginal leakage of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Hood JA; Purton DG
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(5):229-35. PubMed ID: 9863443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Microleakage of a dental amalgam alloy bonding agent.
    Saiku JM; St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):172-8. PubMed ID: 8152986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Quantification of marginal leakage of amalgam restorations in vitro.
    vd Veen H; Scholtanus H; Arends J
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 6585523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. In vivo and in vitro evaluations of microleakage around Class I amalgam and composite restorations.
    Alptekin T; Ozer F; Unlu N; Cobanoglu N; Blatz MB
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 21180003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The new generation amalgam alloys. Clinical considerations.
    Jordan RE; Suzuki M; Boksman L
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):341-58. PubMed ID: 3858165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Immediate-polished and as-carved Tytin restorations after 12 months.
    Fenton RA; Smales RJ
    J Dent; 1984 Jun; 12(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 6589255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A comparison of different techniques for finishing and polishing amalgam.
    Eide R; Tveit AB
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1987 Jun; 45(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 3475948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Clinical evaluation of high-copper dental amalgams with and without admixed indium.
    Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Powell LV
    Am J Dent; 1992 Feb; 5(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 1524741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Approximal surface finishes on amalgam restorations.
    McLundie AC; Patterson CJ; Stirrups DR
    Restorative Dent; 1988 Feb; 4(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 3270093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Particular S.E.M. aspects of variously treated amalgam surfaces: preliminary report].
    Dallari A; Rovatti L
    J Am Dent Assoc (Ed Ital); 1986 Mar; 2(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 3464695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.