These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8483651)

  • 1. Phonological similarity effect is abolished by a silent mouthing task.
    Saito S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Apr; 76(2):427-31. PubMed ID: 8483651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Influence of articulatory suppression and memory updating on phonological similarity effect].
    Saito S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1993 Oct; 64(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 8301894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What effect can rhythmic finger tapping have on the phonological similarity effect?
    Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Mar; 22(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 8035694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Irrelevant sound disrupts speech production: exploring the relationship between short-term memory and experimentally induced slips of the tongue.
    Saito S; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Oct; 57(7):1309-40. PubMed ID: 15513248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual similarity effects in immediate verbal serial recall.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; Wynn V; Baddeley AD
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):626-46. PubMed ID: 10994221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the phonological similarity effect in working memory due to proactive interference?
    Baddeley AD; Hitch GJ; Quinlan PT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1312-1316. PubMed ID: 29648863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of visual similarity on short-term memory for spatial location: implications for the capacity of visual short-term memory.
    Walker P; Hitch GJ; Duroe S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1993 Aug; 83(3):203-24. PubMed ID: 8213213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects.
    Martín-Loeches M; Schweinberger SR; Sommer W
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jul; 25(4):471-83. PubMed ID: 9259625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of phonological repetition on cortical magnetic responses evoked by visually presented words.
    Sekiguchi T; Koyama S; Kakigi R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1250-61. PubMed ID: 15453977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phonological similarity in working memory.
    Copeland DE; Radvansky GA
    Mem Cognit; 2001 Jul; 29(5):774-6. PubMed ID: 11531232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opposing effects of phonological similarity on item and order memory of words and nonwords in the serial recall task.
    Lian A; Karlsen PJ; Eriksen TB
    Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):314-37. PubMed ID: 15279435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic and phonological loop effects on verbal working memory in middle-age adults with mental retardation.
    Kittler P; Krinsky-McHale SJ; Devenny DA
    Am J Ment Retard; 2004 Nov; 109(6):467-80. PubMed ID: 15471513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC; Shaibe DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):100-18. PubMed ID: 9080790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store?
    Jones DM; Macken WJ; Nicholls AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):656-74. PubMed ID: 15099134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Input and output modes modulate phonological and semantic contributions to immediate serial recall: evidence from a brain-damaged patient.
    Chassé V; Belleville S
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Mar; 26(2):195-216. PubMed ID: 19418315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect?
    Hanley JR
    Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 9231151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.