These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8484656)

  • 1. Fatigue effect within 10 degrees visual field in automated perimetry.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1993 Apr; 25(4):142-4. PubMed ID: 8484656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of standard automated perimetry with matrix frequency-doubling technology in patients with resolved optic neuritis.
    Sakai T; Matsushima M; Shikishima K; Kitahara K
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):949-56. PubMed ID: 17382395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Results of static perimetry in subclinical optic neuritis in multiple sclerosis].
    Mauguière F; Perret-Magloire E
    Rev Neurol (Paris); 1983; 139(12):745-52. PubMed ID: 6665389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Pattern reversal VEP and computer perimetry of the partner eye in optic neuritis].
    Lowitzsch K; Welkoborsky HJ
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1987 Dec; 18(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 3123195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the central visual field by the Friedmann Mark I analyzer and color vision in 85 patients with multiple sclerosis. Correlation with visual evoked potentials in 50 cases].
    Grochowicki M; Vighetto A
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988; 11(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 3385126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry.
    Hudson C; Wild JM; O'Neill EC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 35(1):268-80. PubMed ID: 8300355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High-pass resolution perimetry in optic neuritis.
    Wall M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Aug; 32(9):2525-9. PubMed ID: 1869407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hidden visual loss in optic neuropathy is revealed using Gabor patch contrast perimetry.
    Bodis-Wollner I; Brannan JR
    Clin Neurosci; 1997; 4(5):284-91. PubMed ID: 9292257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A study on retinal light sensitivity of normal human visual fields].
    Yu MB; Zhou WB; Ye TC
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Sep; 30(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 7805534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inapparent visual field defects in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Vidović T; Cerovski B; Vidović DH; Cerovski J; Novak-Laus K
    Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():67-73. PubMed ID: 16193681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A comparison of central visual field measurement by automated perimetry in optic neuritis due to multiple sclerosis and of unknown etiology].
    Fujimoto N
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 May; 93(5):581-6. PubMed ID: 2801361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons.
    Kerrigan-Baumrind LA; Quigley HA; Pease ME; Kerrigan DF; Mitchell RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Mar; 41(3):741-8. PubMed ID: 10711689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Points of a normal visual field are not statistically independent.
    Lachenmayr BJ; Kiermeir U; Kojetinsky S
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1995 May; 4(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 7663331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple-stimulus presentation and voice control in automated perimetry.
    Mueller AJ; Lachenmayr BJ; Eckstein A; Hölzl M
    Ger J Ophthalmol; 1992; 1(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 1477632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in subjects with suspected glaucoma (I): assessment of sensitivity thresholds].
    Polo Llorens V; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez LE; Larrosa Poves JM; Abecia Martínez E; Cuevas Andrés R; Rojo Aragües A; Honrubia López FM
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 11151126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning curve and fatigue effect of flicker defined form perimetry.
    Lamparter J; Schulze A; Schuff AC; Berres M; Pfeiffer N; Hoffmann EM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Jun; 151(6):1057-1064.e1. PubMed ID: 21470593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequency doubling perimetry in resolved optic neuritis.
    Fujimoto N; Adachi-Usami E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Aug; 41(9):2558-60. PubMed ID: 10937566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Central visual field in patients with multiple sclerosis without symptoms of optic neuritis].
    Nizankowska MH; Misiuk-Hojło M; Turno-Krecicka A; Ejma M; Chełstowska J
    Klin Oczna; 1996 Jan; 98(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9019571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.