These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8484999)

  • 21. Rubber dam may increase the survival time of dental restorations.
    Keys W; Carson SJ
    Evid Based Dent; 2017 Mar; 18(1):19-20. PubMed ID: 28338026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report.
    Raskin A; Michotte-Theall B; Vreven J; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 1999 Jan; 27(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 9922607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of two methods of moisture control on marginal microleakage between resin composite and etched enamel: a clinical study.
    Knight GT; Berry TG; Barghi N; Burns TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 8297458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Clinical evaluation of resin-bonded gold alloy veneers.
    Chana H; Kelleher M; Briggs P; Hooper R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 10709037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of cervical restorations on the periodontal tissues: 5-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Favetti M; Montagner AF; Fontes ST; Martins TM; Masotti AS; Jardim PDS; Corrêa FOB; Cenci MS; Muniz FWMG
    J Dent; 2021 Mar; 106():103571. PubMed ID: 33385534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Higher experience of caries and lower income trajectory influence the quality of restorations: A multilevel analysis in a birth cohort.
    Collares K; Opdam NJ; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():79-84. PubMed ID: 29169969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longevity of cusp-covered amalgams: survivals after 15 years.
    Smales RJ
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 1784534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: six-year results.
    Mertz-Fairhurst EJ; Smith CD; Williams JE; Sherrer JD; Mackert JR; Richards EE; Schuster GS; O'Dell NL; Pierce KL; Kovarik RE
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Dec; 23(12):827-38. PubMed ID: 1305301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
    Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Hall AC; Randall RC; Widstrom E; Forss H
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jun; 194(11):613-8; discussion 609. PubMed ID: 12819697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study.
    Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Resin composites in the post-amalgam age.
    Lutz F; Krejci I
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Dec; 20(12):1138-44, 1146, 1148. PubMed ID: 10850266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of occlusal marginal adaptation of Class II resin-composite restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; Gruythuysen RJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(4-5):310-4. PubMed ID: 8258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes.
    Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 20448613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Two years survival rate of Class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination.
    Carvalho TS; Sampaio FC; Diniz A; Bönecker M; Van Amerongen WE
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):419-25. PubMed ID: 20642474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite.
    Olmez A; Ulusu T
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Esthetic veneering of amalgam restorations with composite resin--combining the best of both worlds?
    Plasmans PJ; Reukers EA
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 8337184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice.
    Whitworth JM; Myers PM; Smith J; Walls AW; McCabe JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):409-16. PubMed ID: 15910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.