These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8485677)

  • 1. Electronic fetal monitoring: a Canadian survey.
    Davies BL; Niday PA; Nimrod CA; Drake ER; Sprague AE; Trépanier MJ
    CMAJ; 1993 May; 148(10):1737-42. PubMed ID: 8485677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.
    Devane D; Lalor J; Bonnar J
    Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):360-2. PubMed ID: 17432809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors influencing the delivery of abortion services in Ontario: a descriptive study.
    Ferris LE; McMain-Klein M; Iron K
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(3):134-8. PubMed ID: 9635262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized trial of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation.
    Vintzileos AM; Antsaklis A; Varvarigos I; Papas C; Sofatzis I; Montgomery JT
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 8497353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast-feeding policies and practices in Canadian hospitals providing maternity care.
    Levitt CA; Kaczorowski J; Hanvey L; Avard D; Chance GW
    CMAJ; 1996 Jul; 155(2):181-8. PubMed ID: 8800076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are physicians changing the way they practise obstetrics?
    Ruderman J; Carroll JC; Reid AJ; Murray MA
    CMAJ; 1993 Feb; 148(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 8439912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Fetal monitoring sub partu in West Germany. II. Effect of clinic size and clinic type on monitoring practice].
    Roemer VM; Kieback DG; Bühler K
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Jun; 46(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 3744002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A national survey of use of obstetric procedures and technologies in Canadian hospitals: routine or based on existing evidence?
    Kaczorowski J; Levitt C; Hanvey L; Avard D; Chance G
    Birth; 1998 Mar; 25(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9534500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ST segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram plus electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labor and its relationship to umbilical cord arterial blood gases.
    Dervaitis KL; Poole M; Schmidt G; Penava D; Natale R; Gagnon R
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):879-84. PubMed ID: 15467558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up national survey (Sweden) of routines for intrapartum fetal surveillance.
    Holzmann M; Nordström L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):712-4. PubMed ID: 20102293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are Canadian hospitals providing family-centered maternity and newborn care?
    Hanvey L; Levitt C; Chance G
    Leadersh Health Serv; 1996; 5(2):16-20, 46. PubMed ID: 10156772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whither electronic fetal monitoring?
    Sandmire HF
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Dec; 76(6):1130-4. PubMed ID: 2234724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal health surveillance: a community-wide approach versus a tailored intervention for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines.
    Davies B; Hodnett E; Hannah M; O'Brien-Pallas L; Pringle D; Wells G;
    CMAJ; 2002 Sep; 167(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 12240812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fetal heart rate collaborative practice project: situational awareness in electronic fetal monitoring-a Kaiser Permanente Perinatal Patient Safety Program Initiative.
    MacEachin SR; Lopez CM; Powell KJ; Corbett NL
    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 2009; 23(4):314-23; quiz 324-5. PubMed ID: 19915414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the prevention of perinatal brain injury.
    Graham EM; Petersen SM; Christo DK; Fox HE
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):656-66. PubMed ID: 16946228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neonatal resuscitation in Canadian hospitals.
    Chance GW; Hanvey L
    CMAJ; 1987 Mar; 136(6):601-6. PubMed ID: 3815230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auscultation of the fetal heart presents advantages over electronic monitoring.
    Sandmire HF; DeMott RK
    Wis Med J; 1995 Dec; 94(12):661-3. PubMed ID: 8571614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of regional guidelines for intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in women at low obstetric risk.
    Hinsliff SW; Hindley C; Thomson AM
    Midwifery; 2004 Dec; 20(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 15571883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Failure to rescue as a process measure to evaluate fetal safety during labor.
    Beaulieu MJ
    MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs; 2009; 34(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 19104315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electronic fetal monitoring in the United States in the 1980s.
    Albers LL; Krulewitch CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jul; 82(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 8515931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.