These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 848576)

  • 1. Dangerousness, confidentiality, and the duty to warn.
    Roth LH; Meisel A
    Am J Psychiatry; 1977 May; 134(5):508-11. PubMed ID: 848576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unexpected clinical features of the Tarasoff decision: the therapeutic alliance and the "duty to warn".
    Wulsin LR; Bursztajn H; Gutheil TG
    Am J Psychiatry; 1983 May; 140(5):601-3. PubMed ID: 6846591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapist's obligation of confidentiality versus the duty to warn.
    Nesbitt NA
    Tulsa Law J; 1977; 12(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 11661722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness.
    Greenberg LT
    J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):315-48. PubMed ID: 11658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 1 Jul 1976.
    California. Supreme Court, In Bank
    Wests Calif Report; 1976; 131():14-42. PubMed ID: 11646056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Untangling Tarasoff: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California.
    Seligman BS
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Sep; 29(1):179-210. PubMed ID: 11661581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judicial expansion of the Tarasoff doctrine: doctors' dilemma.
    Crocker EM
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(1-2):83-99. PubMed ID: 11658739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California--risk allocation in mental health care: whether to treat the patient or his victim.
    Lowe RH
    Utah Law Rev; 1975; 1975(2):553-69. PubMed ID: 11658320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beyond Tarasoff: AIDS and the obligation to breach confidentiality.
    Labowitz KE
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1990; 9(2):495-517. PubMed ID: 11651114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tarasoff: protective privilege versus public peril.
    Gurevitz H
    Am J Psychiatry; 1977 Mar; 134(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 842706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's.
    Perlin ML
    Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidentiality and the "dangerous" patient: implications of Tarasoff for psychiatrists and lawyers.
    Merton V
    Emory Law J; 1982; 31(2):263-343. PubMed ID: 11653483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapists, policemen and the duty to warn--an unreasonable extension of the common law?
    Kaplan RB
    Gold Gate Law Rev; 1975; 6(1):229-48. PubMed ID: 11661331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. It's been a privilege: advising patients of the Tarasoff duty and its legal consequences for the federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Klinka E
    Fordham Law Rev; 2009 Nov; 78(2):863-931. PubMed ID: 19938380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cause of action can be stated against psychotherapists employed by university hospital...for breach of duty to warn victim of peril from patient as disclosed by patient's communications.
    Houst Law Rev; 1975 May; 12(4):986-8. PubMed ID: 11661409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Law and psychiatry: when must the doctor warn others of the potential dangerousness of his patient's condition?
    Annas GJ
    Medicoleg News; 1975 Apr; 3(2):1+. PubMed ID: 11661434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tarasoff: five years later.
    Knapp S; Vandecreek L
    Prof Psychol; 1982 Aug; 13(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 11658658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tarasoff, the doctrine of special relationships, and the psychotherapist's duty to warn.
    Schopp RF; Quattrocchi MR
    J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(1):13-37. PubMed ID: 11649643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dangerous patient exception and the duty to warn: creation of a dangerous precedent?
    Lee V
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1976; 9():549-68. PubMed ID: 11664780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Legal issues in medical management of violent and threatening patients.
    Dickens BM
    Can J Psychiatry; 1986 Nov; 31(8):772-80. PubMed ID: 3791135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.