BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8486866)

  • 21. Clinical trials and technology assessment.
    Banta D
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1987 Mar; 13(3):94-8. PubMed ID: 3106879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use and acquisition of surgical laser technology.
    Health Devices; 1991; 20(7-8):241-316. PubMed ID: 1908447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Joint report of the Council on Scientific Affairs and the Council on Medical Service. Technology assessment in medicine.
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Jan; 152(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 1728928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. New technology in electrophysiology: FDA process and perspective.
    Selzman KA; Fellman M; Farb A; de Del Castillo S; Zuckerman B
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2016 Oct; 47(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27020440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methodological issues in undertaking independent cost-effectiveness analysis for NICE: the case of therapies for ADHD.
    Griffin SC; Weatherly HL; Richardson GA; Drummond MF
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 May; 9(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17476538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Health care technology.
    Robbins K
    State Health Care Am; 1994; ():63-6. PubMed ID: 10133853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Guidelines for the adoption of new technologies: a prescription for uncontrolled growth in expenditures and how to avoid the problem.
    Gafni A; Birch S
    CMAJ; 1993 Mar; 148(6):913-7. PubMed ID: 8448705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. EUR-ASSESS Project Subgroup report on Methodology. Methodological guidance for the conduct of health technology assessment.
    Liberati A; Sheldon TA; Banta HD
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(2):186-219. PubMed ID: 9194352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Healthcare technology assessment: methods, framework, and role in policy making.
    Goodman CS
    Am J Manag Care; 1998 Sep; 4 Spec No():SP200-14; quiz SP215-6. PubMed ID: 10185995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experiences with evaluating the safety and efficacy of medical technologies.
    Moses LE; Brown BW
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1984; 5():267-92. PubMed ID: 6372811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medical technology assessment: adequate questions, appropriate methods, valuable answers.
    Glasser JH; Chrzanowski RS
    Health Policy; 1988; 9(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 10312551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Swan to phoenix: the metamorphosis.
    Brandstetter RD; Grant GR; Gitler B
    Heart Lung; 1998; 27(4):215-7. PubMed ID: 9713711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ultrasound technology: the RADIUS (Routine Antenatal Diagnostic Imaging with Ultrasound) study & national policy.
    Huang L
    J Clin Eng; 1994; 19(4):297-309. PubMed ID: 10137111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The importance of subjective values to medical technology assessment and health policy.
    Diamond GA
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1993; 5(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 10148297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ambulatory telemetry arrhythmia monitoring systems.
    Health Devices; 1994 Jul; 23(7):264-305. PubMed ID: 7852076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Economic analysis in randomized control trials.
    Adams ME; McCall NT; Gray DT; Orza MJ; Chalmers TC
    Med Care; 1992 Mar; 30(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 1538611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. AAMI Standards: A History of Ensuring Medical Technology Quality and Performance.
    Lewelling J
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2017; 51(3):210-211. PubMed ID: 28530882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Health technology assessment for medical devices in Europe. What must be considered.
    Siebert M; Clauss LC; Carlisle M; Casteels B; de Jong P; Kreuzer M; Sanghera S; Stokoe G; Trueman P; Lang AW;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(3):733-40. PubMed ID: 12391964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Limitations of nonscience in surgical epistemology. The second-look laparotomy.
    Baum M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1989; 5(3):381-9. PubMed ID: 10303909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Healthcare technology and technology assessment.
    Herndon JH; Hwang R; Bozic KJ
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1293-302. PubMed ID: 17426985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.