187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8487238)
1. Fetal biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length. A comparison by race and sex.
Davis RO; Cutter GR; Goldenberg RL; Hoffman HJ; Cliver SP; Brumfield CG
J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 8487238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation using head and abdominal circumference and femur length].
Mladenović-Segedi L; Segedi D
Med Pregl; 2005; 58(11-12):548-52. PubMed ID: 16673856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Femur-sparing pattern of abnormal fetal growth in pregnant women from New York City after maternal Zika virus infection.
Walker CL; Merriam AA; Ohuma EO; Dighe MK; Gale M; Rajagopal L; Papageorghiou AT; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Adams Waldorf KM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):187.e1-187.e20. PubMed ID: 29738748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of three sonographic circumference measurement techniques to predict birth weight.
Smulian JC; Ranzini AC; Ananth CV; Rosenberg JC; Vintzileos AM
Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 93(5 Pt 1):692-6. PubMed ID: 10912969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur.
Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):172-85. PubMed ID: 16289532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrepancy in ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) in breech presented fetuses.
Lubusky M; Prochazka M; Langova M; Vomackova K; Cizek L
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2007 Dec; 151(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 18345272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal size in the second trimester is associated with the duration of pregnancy, small fetuses having longer pregnancies.
Johnsen SL; Wilsgaard T; Rasmussen S; Hanson MA; Godfrey KM; Kiserud T
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2008 Jul; 8():25. PubMed ID: 18627638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regression formula for estimation of fetal weight with use of abdominal circumference and femur length: a prospective study.
Ferrero A; Maggi E; Giancotti A; Torcia F; Pachì A
J Ultrasound Med; 1994 Nov; 13(11):823-33. PubMed ID: 7837327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
Dubiel M; Krajewski M; Pietryga M; Tretyn A; Breborowicz G; Lindquist P; Gudmundsson S
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21
Stirnemann J; Villar J; Salomon LJ; Ohuma E; Ruyan P; Altman DG; Nosten F; Craik R; Munim S; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Norris S; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Purwar M; Victora CG; Uauy R; Bhutta Z; Kennedy S; Papageorghiou AT; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):478-486. PubMed ID: 27804212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Racial differences in fetal morphometry in Singapore.
Yeo GS; Chan WB; Lun KC; Lai FM
Ann Acad Med Singap; 1994 May; 23(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 7944253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry.
Peixoto-Filho FM; de Sá RA; Velarde LG; de Castro Mocarzel C; Lopes LM; Ville Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22899306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of intrauterine growth pattern of twins by linear discriminant analysis of the values of biparietal diameter, femur length and abdominal circumference1.
Farina A; Vesce F; Garutti P; Jorizzo G; Bianciotto A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1999; 48(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10394085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal growth velocity: kinetic, clinical, and biological aspects.
Bertino E; Di Battista E; Bossi A; Pagliano M; Fabris C; Aicardi G; Milani S
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 1996 Jan; 74(1):F10-5. PubMed ID: 8653429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of fetal and parental factors on intrauterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort.
Albouy-Llaty M; Thiebaugeorges O; Goua V; Magnin G; Schweitzer M; Forhan A; Lelong N; Slama R; Charles MA; Kaminski M;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 21438052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15-40 weeks of gestation.
Schwärzler P; Bland JM; Holden D; Campbell S; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 14970994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
