These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8487527)

  • 1. Loudness matching of signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid.
    Punch J; Rakerd B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 8487527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness discrimination of speech signals spectrally shaped by a simulated hearing aid.
    Rakerd B; Punch J; Hooks W; Amlani A; Vander Velde TJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Dec; 42(6):1285-94. PubMed ID: 10599612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Restoring Perceived Loudness for Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):664-678. PubMed ID: 29210810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spectral and binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():179-192. PubMed ID: 27006003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of suppression on restoration of spectral loudness summation in listeners with hearing loss.
    Rasetshwane DM; High RR; Kopun JG; Neely ST; Gorga MP; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):2994. PubMed ID: 29857738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uni- and bilateral spectral loudness summation and binaural loudness summation with loudness matching and categorical loudness scaling.
    van Beurden M; Boymans M; van Geleuken M; Oetting D; Kollmeier B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2021 May; 60(5):350-358. PubMed ID: 33100070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing aid gain for loudness-density normalization in cochlear hearing losses with impaired frequency resolution.
    Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 1783226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceived sound quality in a hearing aid with vented and closed earmould equalized in frequency response.
    Lundberg G; Ovegård A; Hagerman B; Gabrielsson A; Brändström U
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 1641577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Potential Consequences of Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Bilateral Hearing Aid Fitting.
    van Beurden M; Boymans M; van Geleuken M; Oetting D; Kollmeier B; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518805690. PubMed ID: 30353784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of test signal type and bandwidth on the categorical scaling of loudness.
    Ricketts TA; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Apr; 99(4 Pt 1):2281-7. PubMed ID: 8730074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectral loudness summation as a function of duration for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Verhey JL; Anweiler AK; Hohmann V
    Int J Audiol; 2006 May; 45(5):287-94. PubMed ID: 16717019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods.
    Moore BC; Sęk A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Loudness judgment procedures for evaluating hearing aid preselection decisions for severely and profoundly hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gottermeier L; De Filippo CL; Block MG
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 1783228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 3745681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal integration of loudness in listeners with hearing losses of primarily cochlear origin.
    Buus S; Florentine M; Poulsen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3464-80. PubMed ID: 10380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Loudness of dynamic stimuli in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Zhang C; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Nov; 102(5 Pt 1):2925-34. PubMed ID: 9373979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.
    Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting the loudness of modulated sounds.
    Moore BC; Vickers DA; Baer T; Launer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2757-72. PubMed ID: 10335628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative loudness perception of low and high frequency sounds in the open and occluded ear.
    Keidser G; Katsch R; Dillon H; Grant F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3351-7. PubMed ID: 10875380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.