92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8487602)
1. [Adjusting for studied districts can be useful].
Steineck G; Hakulinen T
Lakartidningen; 1993 Apr; 90(17):1636-7. PubMed ID: 8487602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Current statistics by the SBU are not up to date].
Tabár L
Lakartidningen; 1995 Nov; 92(48):4540-1. PubMed ID: 7490966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Assessment of the effect of mammographic screening can not be based on wrong data].
Tabár L
Lakartidningen; 1999 Apr; 96(14):1763-4. PubMed ID: 10222696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing the effects of lead-time bias, length bias and over-detection in evaluating screening mammography: a censored bivariate data approach.
Mahnken JD; Chan W; Freeman DH; Freeman JL
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):643-63. PubMed ID: 18445697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of service screening mammography on population mortality from breast carcinoma.
Feig SA
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 12209736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Mammographic screening does not reduce breast cancer mortality].
Sjönell G; Ståhle L
Lakartidningen; 1999 Feb; 96(8):904-5, 908-13. PubMed ID: 10089737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reduced mortality with mammographic screening. The natural course, too rough methods resulted in miscalculation on breast cancer].
Rutqvist LE
Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(10):1210-1. PubMed ID: 10193130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome measures of an Australian breast-screening program.
Rodger A; Kavanagh AM
Med J Aust; 1998 Aug; 169(4):179-80. PubMed ID: 9734571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening mammography may not be effective at any age.
Wilkerson BF; Schooff M
J Fam Pract; 2000 Apr; 49(4):302, 371. PubMed ID: 10778833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The MISCAN-Fadia continuous tumor growth model for breast cancer.
Tan SY; van Oortmarssen GJ; de Koning HJ; Boer R; Habbema JD
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):56-65. PubMed ID: 17032895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.
Jonsson H; Bordás P; Wallin H; Nyström L; Lenner P
J Med Screen; 2007; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 17626708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
Bick U
Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The mammographic screening project in 2 local health units of Piemonte].
Castiglione F; Destefanis M; Marenco D; Gosso P; Manera G; Porcile G
Epidemiol Prev; 1996; 20(2-3):157-9. PubMed ID: 8766310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties.
Duffy SW; Tabár L; Chen HH; Holmqvist M; Yen MF; Abdsalah S; Epstein B; Frodis E; Ljungberg E; Hedborg-Melander C; Sundbom A; Tholin M; Wiege M; Akerlund A; Wu HM; Tung TS; Chiu YH; Chiu CP; Huang CC; Smith RA; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Holmberg L
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 12209737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of the Two-County trial of mammography screening are not compatible with contemporaneous official Swedish breast cancer statistics.
Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Andersen JM; Maehlen J
Dan Med Bull; 2006 Nov; 53(4):438-40. PubMed ID: 17150148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The debate on breast cancer screening with mammography is important.
Gøtzsche PC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 17411511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography's upside outweighs possible risks.
Feig SA; Hendrick RE
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1993 Mar; 15(3):121-5, 128, 141. PubMed ID: 10148388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stat bite: Frequency of breast cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Nov; 96(22):1657. PubMed ID: 15547177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Meta-analyses are necessary but technically difficult. Hard criticism against an article on mammography].
Taube A
Lakartidningen; 1993 Feb; 90(7):608-10; discussion 611. PubMed ID: 7786323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The National Board of Health and Welfare on mammographic screening: mortality analysis requires completely different methods].
Rehnqvist N; Rosén M; Karlberg I
Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(9):1050-1. PubMed ID: 10093453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
