These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8487874)

  • 21. Predictors of nurses' perceptions of barriers to research utilization.
    Kajermo KN; Undén M; Gardulf A; Eriksson LE; Orton ML; Arnetz BB; Nordström G
    J Nurs Manag; 2008 Apr; 16(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 18324990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perspectives of research participants, psychologist investigators, and institutional review boards.
    Schreier BA; Stadler HA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Jun; 74(3 Pt 2):1067-72. PubMed ID: 1501970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The perceived impact of committee participation on job satisfaction and retention of staff nurses.
    Skelton-Green JM
    Can J Nurs Adm; 1996; 9(2):7-35. PubMed ID: 8716469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Nursing the clinic vs. nursing the patient: nurses' experience of a day hospital chemotherapy service.
    Mcilfatrick S; Sullivan K; McKenna H
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Sep; 15(9):1170-8. PubMed ID: 16911058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A source of support. An ethics committee helps nurses do the right thing.
    Haddad AM
    Health Prog; 1991; 72(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 10108427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethical and human rights concerns of Connecticut nurses: survey and implications for the profession.
    Redman BK; Donovan C
    Nursingconnections; 1999; 12(3):41-6. PubMed ID: 10788903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nursing and public participation in health: an ethnographic study of a patient council.
    Brooks F
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Jan; 45(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 17046769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. "Walking along beside the researcher": how Canadian REBs/IRBs are responding to the needs of community-based participatory research.
    Guta A; Nixon S; Gahagan J; Fielden S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2012 Feb; 7(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 22378131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Medical education research and IRB review: an analysis and comparison of the IRB review process at six institutions.
    Dyrbye LN; Thomas MR; Mechaber AJ; Eacker A; Harper W; Massie FS; Power DV; Shanafelt TD
    Acad Med; 2007 Jul; 82(7):654-60. PubMed ID: 17595560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Barriers to research utilization for oncology staff nurses and nurse managers/clinical nurse specialists.
    Rutledge DN; Ropka M; Greene PE; Nail L; Mooney KH
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1998 Apr; 25(3):497-506. PubMed ID: 9568605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The impact of an ICU liaison nurse: a case study of ward nurses' perceptions.
    Chaboyer W; Gillespie B; Foster M; Kendall M
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Jul; 14(6):766-75. PubMed ID: 15946285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of the clinical trial nurse in the informed consent process.
    Cantini F; Ells C
    Can J Nurs Res; 2007 Jun; 39(2):126-44. PubMed ID: 17679589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nurse involvement in Institutional Review Boards; the service setting perspective.
    Robb SS
    Nurs Res; 1981; 30(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 6906012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relational ethics and advocacy in nursing: literature review.
    MacDonald H
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Jan; 57(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 17214748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethical attitudes of nurse, physician, and unaffiliated members of institutional review boards.
    Rothstein WG; Phuong LH
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2007; 39(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 17393970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ethical evaluation of hypnosis research: a survey of investigators and their institutional review boards.
    Council JR; Smith EJ; Kaster-Bundgaard J; Gladue BA
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1997 Apr; 39(4):258-65. PubMed ID: 9141301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What Can IRBs Learn From CABs? A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Recruitment and Training of Nonscientist Members on Research Review Boards.
    Solomon Cargill S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Feb; 13(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 29226746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The protectors and the protected: what regulators and researchers can learn from IRB members and subjects.
    Cook AF; Hoas H; Joyner JC
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2013; 3(1):51-65. PubMed ID: 24407005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Clinical Innovation: A Survey of Investigators and IRB Members.
    Stryjewski TP; Kalish BT; Silverman B; Lehmann LS
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Dec; 10(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 26564945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The development and acceptance of a simple tool to aid IRB compliance.
    Vulcano DM
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2012; 21(3):203-8. PubMed ID: 22722526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.