134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8489166)
1. Comparison of half-band and full-band electrodes for intracochlear electrical stimulation.
Xu SA; McAnally KI; Xu J; Clark GM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 May; 102(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8489166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects.
Cords SM; Reuter G; Issing PR; Sommer A; Kuzma J; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 10733186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array using the 2-deoxyglucose technique.
Brown M; Shepherd RK; Webster WR; Martin RL; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1992 May; 59(2):224-40. PubMed ID: 1618713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delayed electrical stimulation and BDNF application following induced deafness in rats.
Song BN; Li YX; Han DM
Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 129(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 18607918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.
Spelman FA; Clopton BM; Pfingst BE
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():3-8. PubMed ID: 6814331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation.
Snyder RL; Rebscher SJ; Cao KL; Leake PA; Kelly K
Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):7-33. PubMed ID: 2076984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurements of threshold shifts observed when using normal and preformed electrodes.
Reuter G; Cords SM; Issing P; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S26. PubMed ID: 9391585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens.
Ni D; Shepherd RK; Seldon HL; Xu SA; Clark GM; Millard RE
Hear Res; 1992 Sep; 62(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 1429252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute effects of electrical intracochlear multichannel high-rate stimulation of the auditory nerve of cats.
Cords SM; Reuter G; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S19-20. PubMed ID: 9391581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities results in platinum dissolution but not neural loss or functional changes in vivo.
Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Enke YL; Wise AK; Fallon JB
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026009. PubMed ID: 30523828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
Mitchell A; Miller JM; Finger PA; Heller JW; Raphael Y; Altschuler RA
Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.
Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neural mechanisms relevant to the design of an auditory prosthesis. Location and electrical characteristics.
Clopton BM; Spelman FA
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():9-14. PubMed ID: 6814332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the evoked auditory brain stem response amplitude peak IV during chronic electrical, intracochlear, multichannel high-rate stimulation.
Cords SM; Reuter G; Issing P; Lenarz T
Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S22-3. PubMed ID: 9391583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation.
Rebscher SJ; Snyder RL; Leake PA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2035-48. PubMed ID: 11386556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
