These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8489166)

  • 1. Comparison of half-band and full-band electrodes for intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Xu SA; McAnally KI; Xu J; Clark GM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1993 May; 102(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8489166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J; Shepherd RK; Millard RE; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects.
    Cords SM; Reuter G; Issing PR; Sommer A; Kuzma J; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 2000 Mar; 21(2):212-7. PubMed ID: 10733186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array using the 2-deoxyglucose technique.
    Brown M; Shepherd RK; Webster WR; Martin RL; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1992 May; 59(2):224-40. PubMed ID: 1618713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.
    Shepherd RK; Hatsushika S; Clark GM
    Hear Res; 1993 Mar; 66(1):108-20. PubMed ID: 8473242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delayed electrical stimulation and BDNF application following induced deafness in rats.
    Song BN; Li YX; Han DM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2009 Feb; 129(2):142-54. PubMed ID: 18607918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tissue impedance and current flow in the implanted ear. Implications for the cochlear prosthesis.
    Spelman FA; Clopton BM; Pfingst BE
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():3-8. PubMed ID: 6814331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I: Expansion of central representation.
    Snyder RL; Rebscher SJ; Cao KL; Leake PA; Kelly K
    Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 50(1-2):7-33. PubMed ID: 2076984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of focused multipolar stimulation for cochlear implants: a preclinical safety study.
    Shepherd RK; Wise AK; Enke YL; Carter PM; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046020. PubMed ID: 28607224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements of threshold shifts observed when using normal and preformed electrodes.
    Reuter G; Cords SM; Issing P; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S26. PubMed ID: 9391585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I: Normal hearing kittens.
    Ni D; Shepherd RK; Seldon HL; Xu SA; Clark GM; Millard RE
    Hear Res; 1992 Sep; 62(1):63-81. PubMed ID: 1429252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute effects of electrical intracochlear multichannel high-rate stimulation of the auditory nerve of cats.
    Cords SM; Reuter G; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S19-20. PubMed ID: 9391581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
    Huang CQ; Shepherd RK
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation at high charge densities results in platinum dissolution but not neural loss or functional changes in vivo.
    Shepherd RK; Carter PM; Enke YL; Wise AK; Fallon JB
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026009. PubMed ID: 30523828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of chronic high-rate electrical stimulation on the cochlea and eighth nerve in the deafened guinea pig.
    Mitchell A; Miller JM; Finger PA; Heller JW; Raphael Y; Altschuler RA
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):30-43. PubMed ID: 9083802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.
    Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural mechanisms relevant to the design of an auditory prosthesis. Location and electrical characteristics.
    Clopton BM; Spelman FA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 98():9-14. PubMed ID: 6814332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of the evoked auditory brain stem response amplitude peak IV during chronic electrical, intracochlear, multichannel high-rate stimulation.
    Cords SM; Reuter G; Issing P; Lenarz T
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S22-3. PubMed ID: 9391583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation.
    Rebscher SJ; Snyder RL; Leake PA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2035-48. PubMed ID: 11386556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of an electrode for the artificial cochlear sensory epithelium.
    Tona Y; Inaoka T; Ito J; Kawano S; Nakagawa T
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):106-12. PubMed ID: 26299844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.