These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8489476)

  • 1. The masked threshold to noise ratio in brainstem electric response audiometry: assessment of the conductive loss component by bone-conducted masking.
    Janssen EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1993; 32(3):153-63. PubMed ID: 8489476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory brainstem response. Sensory assessment by bone conduction masking.
    Hicks GE
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1980 Jul; 106(7):392-5. PubMed ID: 7387525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone-conduction masking for threshold assessment in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Webb KC; Greenberg HJ
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 6628853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Brainstem electric response audiometry: estimation of the amount of conductive hearing loss with and without use of the response threshold.
    van der Drift JF; van Zanten GA; Brocaar MP
    Audiology; 1989; 28(4):181-93. PubMed ID: 2751487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noise effective masking level for bone conduction of wide-spectrum short-duration signals in normal hearing adults.
    Shi W; Zhang SJ; Zuo HJ; Li N; Ding HN; Zhong B; Ji F
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jun; 63(6):467-471. PubMed ID: 37083104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response threshold elicited by clicks masked with 1590-Hz high-pass noise in subjects with sloping cochlear hearing losses.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):272-83. PubMed ID: 1449430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audiometry: masking.
    Hamid MA; Brookler KH
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Oct; 85(10):646-7. PubMed ID: 17124933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between the frequency specificities of auditory brainstem response thresholds to clicks with and without high-pass masking noise.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA; van der Drift JF
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):284-92. PubMed ID: 1449431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone conduction masking for brainstem auditory-evoked potentials (BAEP) in pediatric audiological evaluations. Validation of the test.
    Ysunza A; Cone-Wesson B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1987 Feb; 12(3):291-302. PubMed ID: 3583583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests.
    Chaplin RG; Miyamoto RT
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Frequency specificity of the auditory brainstem response elicited by 1,000-Hz filtered clicks.
    Conijn EA; Brocaar MP; van Zanten GA
    Audiology; 1990; 29(4):181-95. PubMed ID: 2222287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Background noise in rooms used for pure-tone audiometry in disability assessment.
    Robinson DW
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Feb; 26(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 1586848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E; Olofsson A; Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of the pure-tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review.
    Stapells DR; Oates P
    Audiol Neurootol; 1997; 2(5):257-80. PubMed ID: 9390836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Naunton's Masking Dilemma Revisited.
    Seneviratne S; McNeill C; Greenberg SL; Kong J
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 30531635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to bone-conducted stimuli.
    Kramer SJ
    Audiology; 1992; 31(2):61-71. PubMed ID: 1610314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimal upward spread of masking: correlations with speech and auditory brainstem response masked thresholds.
    Klein AJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3422-30. PubMed ID: 8326068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.