These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8489478)

  • 1. Relative effective frequency response of bone versus air conduction stimulation examined via masking.
    Durrant JD; Hyre R
    Audiology; 1993; 32(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 8489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone.
    Munro KJ; Agnew N
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 10509860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Air conduction, bone conduction, and soft tissue conduction audiograms in normal hearing and simulated hearing losses.
    Adelman C; Cohen A; Regev-Cohen A; Chordekar S; Fraenkel R; Sohmer H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jan; 26(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 25597465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-frequency audiometry. Masking of air- and bone-conduction signals.
    Hallmo P; Sundby A; Mair IW
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 1641573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A standard determination of paired air- and bone-conduction thresholds under different masking noise conditions.
    Robinson DW; Shipton MS
    Audiology; 1982; 21(1):61-82. PubMed ID: 7055482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extended high-frequency bone conduction audiometry Calibration of bone conductor transducers in the conventional and extended high-frequency range.
    Rhebergen KS
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Feb; 62(2):182-191. PubMed ID: 35195500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE; Small SA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of contralateral masking on high-frequency bone-conduction thresholds.
    McDermott JC; Fausti SA; Henry JA; Frey RH
    Audiology; 1990; 29(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 2275644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Binaural Hearing Ability With Bilateral Bone Conduction Stimulation in Subjects With Normal Hearing: Implications for Bone Conduction Hearing Aids.
    Zeitooni M; Mäki-Torkko E; Stenfelt S
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):690-702. PubMed ID: 27560492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurements of bone conduction auditory brainstem response with the new audiometric bone conduction transducer Radioear B81.
    Keceli S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):577-583. PubMed ID: 29911916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
    Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference equivalent threshold levels for pure tones and 1/3-oct noise bands: insert earphone and TDH-49 earphone.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 3950196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mutual cancellation between tones presented by air conduction, by bone conduction and by non-osseous (soft tissue) bone conduction.
    Chordekar S; Kriksunov L; Kishon-Rabin L; Adelman C; Sohmer H
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):180-4. PubMed ID: 22037489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-frequency audiometry. Masking in electric bone-conduction audiometry.
    Löppönen H
    Scand Audiol; 1992; 21(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 1585128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masked high-frequency bone-conduction audiometry: test reliability.
    McDermott JC; Fausti SA; Henry JA; Frey RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Apr; 2(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 1768879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transmission of bone conducted sound - correlation between hearing perception and cochlear vibration.
    Eeg-Olofsson M; Stenfelt S; Taghavi H; Reinfeldt S; Håkansson B; Tengstrand T; Finizia C
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():11-20. PubMed ID: 24047594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone-conduction masking for threshold assessment in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Webb KC; Greenberg HJ
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 6628853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests.
    Chaplin RG; Miyamoto RT
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.