198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8490065)
1. Evaluation and performance of the Coulter STKS.
Verheul FE; Spitters JM; Bergmans CH
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Mar; 31(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 8490065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of leucocyte analysis on the Coulter STKS.
Robertson EP; Lai HW; Wei DC
Clin Lab Haematol; 1992; 14(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 1600694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of the Coulter STKS and the Sysmex NE-1500 in a paediatric population.
Moreau E; Philippé J; Kint J; Benoit Y; Leroux-Roels G
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1994 Jul; 32(7):563-6. PubMed ID: 7981339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated five-part white blood cell differential counts. Efficiency of software-generated white blood cell suspect flags of the hematology analyzers Sysmex SE-9000, Sysmex NE-8000, and Coulter STKS.
Thalhammer-Scherrer R; Knöbl P; Korninger L; Schwarzinger I
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jun; 121(6):573-7. PubMed ID: 9199621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Studies on the efficient application by STKS and 8200].
Mishima S; Unshima T; Yoshida Y; Endo J
Rinsho Byori; 1992 Jun; 40(6):577-85. PubMed ID: 1513029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Evaluation of the Coulter STKS hematologic autoanalyzer].
Fernández de Castro M; Viloria A; Ezquieta B; García San Andrés A; Larrocha C; Jiménez C
Sangre (Barc); 1992 Apr; 37(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 1621190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complete analytical and diagnostic performances of the Abbott Cell Dyn 3500.
Sanzari M; De Toni S; D'Osualdo A; Rossetti M; Floriani F; Plebani M
Panminerva Med; 1998 Jun; 40(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 9689832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A field evaluation of the Coulter STKS.
Warner BA; Reardon DM
Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Feb; 95(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 1899530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory evaluation of the Abbott Cell DYN 3500 5-part differential.
Fournier M; Gireau A; Chretien MC; Ghevaert C; Boniface B; Goudemand J; Cosson A
Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Mar; 105(3):286-92. PubMed ID: 8602608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical performance of leukocyte differential on the new Roche Cobas Vega haematological analyzer.
Lippi G; Nicoli M; Modena N; Guidi G
Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1997 Feb; 35(2):105-10. PubMed ID: 9056752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of the hematologic autoanalyzer Coulter Maxm].
Llompart I; Vila M; Quetglas P; Pérez G; Fuentespina E
Sangre (Barc); 1995 Apr; 40(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 7784941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Leukocyte differential of the Coulter VCS. Evaluation and modalities of use in comparison with the Coulter STKR and manual count].
Jouault H; Imbert M; Mary JY; Ade P; Herpin J; Sultan C
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1990; 48(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 2360747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated haematology analysers: a four-way comparison.
Warner BA; Reardon DM; Marshall DP
Med Lab Sci; 1990 Oct; 47(4):285-96. PubMed ID: 2283932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated leucocyte differentials in 292 patients with leucopenia: an evaluation of the Abbott CELL-DYN 3500 (CD3500) haematology analyser.
Burchert-Graeve M; Kock R
Clin Lab Haematol; 1996 Dec; 18(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 9054698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Abbott Cell Dyn 3000 SL and the Coulter STKS hematology analyzers.
Stroop DM; Triplett RC; Perrotta G; Roberts LP; Schramm RC; Comer K; Miller-Canfield P; Schumacher HR
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 1994; 24(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 8048797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of the Coulter STKR differential histogram and the Coulter VCS formula analysis: a strategy of joint utilization].
Garand R; Accard F
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1989 Sep; 37(7):851-6. PubMed ID: 2631033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Beckman Coulter AcT 5 diff AL hematology analyzer in a hospital setting.
Bhuta UM; Ulstein H
Lab Hematol; 2003; 9(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 14521325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Evaluation of the Cell-DYN 35))].
Costa MJ; Reis AB; Silva C; Fernandes I; Lopes S; Júnior E
Acta Med Port; 1996; 9(10-12):309-18. PubMed ID: 9254527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The white blood cell differential: three methods compared.
Siekmeier R; Bierlich A; Jaross W
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 May; 39(5):432-45. PubMed ID: 11434394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the white blood cell differential given by the new analyser Coulter STKS in both hematological and non-hematological patient groups.
Fialon P; Becker M; Boisseau MR
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1990 Sep; 38(7):743-8. PubMed ID: 2235091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
