These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8490159)

  • 1. [The determination of the surface and organ doses in the AMBER system. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
    Herzog R; von Boetticher H; Luska G
    Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 8490159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AMBER chest radiography and patient dose measurements.
    Persliden J; Fransson SG
    Acta Radiol; 1995 Nov; 36(6):641-3. PubMed ID: 8519576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
    Itouji E; Kono M
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
    Fung KK; Gilboy WB
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
    Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
    Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
    Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
    Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
    Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G; von Boetticher H; Amling B; Herzog R
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease.
    Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW
    Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
    Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The value of the AMBER system in demonstrating intrathoracic space-occupying lesions. A comparative ROC study of the AMBER and conventional technics for postero-anterior views of the thorax. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
    Bitzer M; Strayle M; Schäfer C; Walter E; Brambs HJ; Claussen CD
    Rofo; 1993 Nov; 159(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 8219136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
    Axelsson B; Forsberg H; Hansson B; Haverling M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2012722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Small object contrast in AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
    Chotas HG; Van Metter RL; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 1871306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
    Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed equalization radiography: preliminary clinical evaluation.
    Goodman LR; Wilson CR; Kim CS
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 8421742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction of body doses in rotational panoramic radiography by means of reduced beam width in combination with rare earth intensifying screens.
    Aagaard A; Sewerin I
    Scand J Dent Res; 1986 Dec; 94(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 3468601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
    Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
    Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.