112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8490159)
1. [The determination of the surface and organ doses in the AMBER system. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
Herzog R; von Boetticher H; Luska G
Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):483-6. PubMed ID: 8490159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AMBER chest radiography and patient dose measurements.
Persliden J; Fransson SG
Acta Radiol; 1995 Nov; 36(6):641-3. PubMed ID: 8519576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Experimental and clinical studies on utility of advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary mass lesions].
Itouji E; Kono M
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Nov; 54(13):1252-62. PubMed ID: 7610028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
Fung KK; Gilboy WB
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Thoracic radiographs with the AMBER system. A comparison of the diagnostic image quality of film-screen and storage-phosphor radiographs on the grid-partition stand and the AMBER system].
Busch HP; Hartmann J; Freund MC; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M; Richter K
Rofo; 1992 Mar; 156(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 1550921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AMBER and conventional chest radiography: comparison of radiation dose and image quality.
Geleijns J; Broerse JJ; Julius HW; Vrooman HA; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Kool LJ
Radiology; 1992 Dec; 185(3):719-23. PubMed ID: 1438752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Film-based chest radiography: AMBER vs asymmetric screen-film systems.
Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):743-7. PubMed ID: 8372749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
Luska G; von Boetticher H; Amling B; Herzog R
Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of chest films of equalization radiography (advanced multiple beam equalization radiography). Comparison by means of a receiver operating characteristic study of simulated nodular interstitial disease.
Schultz Kool LJ; van Proosdij M; van Metter R; Vrooman HA; Aarts NJ; Shaw PM; Obermann WR; Heijboer RJ; Memel DS; Oestmann JW
Invest Radiol; 1994 Dec; 29(12):1020-5. PubMed ID: 7721542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Filter wheel equalization in chest radiography: demonstration with a prototype system.
Boone JM; Duryea J; Moore EH
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):845-50. PubMed ID: 7644654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The value of the AMBER system in demonstrating intrathoracic space-occupying lesions. A comparative ROC study of the AMBER and conventional technics for postero-anterior views of the thorax. Advanced Multiple Beam Equalization Radiography].
Bitzer M; Strayle M; Schäfer C; Walter E; Brambs HJ; Claussen CD
Rofo; 1993 Nov; 159(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 8219136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology. Image quality and radiation dose considerations.
Axelsson B; Forsberg H; Hansson B; Haverling M
Acta Radiol; 1991 Jan; 32(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2012722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small object contrast in AMBER and conventional chest radiography.
Chotas HG; Van Metter RL; Johnson GA; Ravin CE
Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):853-9. PubMed ID: 1871306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part II: Occupational exposure.
Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Debaveye D; Bogaerts R; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 15897285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed equalization radiography: preliminary clinical evaluation.
Goodman LR; Wilson CR; Kim CS
Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 8421742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of body doses in rotational panoramic radiography by means of reduced beam width in combination with rare earth intensifying screens.
Aagaard A; Sewerin I
Scand J Dent Res; 1986 Dec; 94(6):530-5. PubMed ID: 3468601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advanced multiple-beam equalization radiography in chest radiology: a simulated nodule detection study.
Kool LJ; Busscher DL; Vlasbloem H; Hermans J; vd Merwe PC; Algra PR; Herstel W
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 3420280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
