These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8490530)

  • 1. The development of a physiological hip prosthesis: evaluation of the strains after implantation of a prototype of hip implant: experiment in a dry femur.
    Vander Sloten J; Labey L; Van Audekercke R; Van der Perre G
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1993; 3(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 8490530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical simulator for the upper femur.
    Munting E; Verhelpen M
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1993; 59(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 8372646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
    Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Photoelastic simulation of a cementless and of a hydroxyapatite coated total hip prosthesis.
    Maquet P; Zhang L; De Lamotte F
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1994; 60(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 8053314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alterations in femoral strain following hip resurfacing and total hip replacement.
    Deuel CR; Jamali AA; Stover SM; Hazelwood SJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):124-30. PubMed ID: 19092017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Gill HS; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):021002. PubMed ID: 20370239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of axial and torsional loading on strain distribution in the proximal femur as related to cementless total hip arthroplasty.
    Otani T; Whiteside LA; White SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1993 Jul; (292):376-83. PubMed ID: 8519135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vitro comparison of surface strain patterns in cementless femoral arthroplasty.
    Boggan RS
    Semin Arthroplasty; 1993 Jul; 4(3):143-53. PubMed ID: 10146280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Extensometry and primary anchorage of femur implants. Study of the upper metaphyseal intracortical support of the B.P.R cement-less implant].
    Delecrin J; Passuti N; Royer J; Rogez JM; Bainvel JV
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1989; 55(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 2801075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone remodeling around total hip implants.
    Smolinski P; Rubash HE
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1992; 20(5-6):461-83. PubMed ID: 1486786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of modular tapered fluted stems on proximal stress shielding in the human femur.
    Hnat WP; Conway JS; Malkani AL; Yakkanti MR; Voor MJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6):957-62. PubMed ID: 18848422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mechanical changes in the femur induced by a joint prosthesis. Comparative extensometric studies].
    Delecrin J; Royer J; Passuty N; Bainvel JV
    Chirurgie; 1991; 117(9):726-31. PubMed ID: 1843673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatigue performance of composite analogue femur constructs under high activity loading.
    Chong AC; Friis EA; Ballard GP; Czuwala PJ; Cooke FW
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 35(7):1196-205. PubMed ID: 17390224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
    Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions.
    Fottner A; Schmid M; Birkenmaier C; Mazoochian F; Plitz W; Volkmar J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jun; 24(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 19307048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The stress in femoral prosthesis: a study of the importance of the diaphyseal support and horizontal setting (author's transl)].
    Lord G; Marotte JH; Blanchard JP; Guillamon JL; Bancel P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1980; 66(3):141-56. PubMed ID: 6450977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Load-shift--numerical evaluation of a new design philosophy for uncemented hip prostheses.
    Goetzen N; Lampe F; Nassut R; Morlock MM
    J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 15652559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.