These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
741 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8491023)
1. Internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in sheep. Cooper RA; Alferness CA; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1993 May; 87(5):1673-86. PubMed ID: 8491023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ventricular proarrhythmic effects of ventricular cycle length and shock strength in a sheep model of transvenous atrial defibrillation. Ayers GM; Alferness CA; Ilina M; Wagner DO; Sirokman WA; Adams JM; Griffin JC Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):413-22. PubMed ID: 8281677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system. Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel rectangular biphasic and monophasic waveforms delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Walsh SJ; Manoharan G; Escalona OJ; Santos J; Evans N; Anderson JM; Stevenson M; Allen JD; Adgey AA Europace; 2006 Oct; 8(10):873-80. PubMed ID: 17000635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of electrode polarity on internal defibrillation with monophasic and biphasic waveforms using an endocardial lead system. Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Walker RG; Smith WM; Ideker RE J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 8(2):161-71. PubMed ID: 9048247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of electrode configuration and capacitor size on internal atrial defibrillation threshold using leads currently used for ventricular defibrillation. Neri R; Palermo P; Cesario AS; Baragli D; Amici E; Laudadio MT; De Rosa A; DeSeta F; Mongeon L; Gambelli G J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 10387142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defibrillation efficacy and pain perception of two biphasic waveforms for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Jung J; Hahn SJ; Heisel A; Buob A; Schubert BD; Siaplaouras S J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Aug; 14(8):837-40. PubMed ID: 12890046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Testing different biphasic waveforms and capacitances: effect on atrial defibrillation threshold and pain perception. Tomassoni G; Newby KH; Kearney MM; Brandon MJ; Barold H; Natale A J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Sep; 28(3):695-9. PubMed ID: 8772758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrode system influence on biphasic waveform defibrillation efficacy in humans. Bardy GH; Troutman C; Johnson G; Mehra R; Poole JE; Dolack GL; Kudenchuk PJ; Gartman DM Circulation; 1991 Aug; 84(2):665-71. PubMed ID: 1860210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveforms in epicardial atrial defibrillation. Keane D; Boyd E; Anderson D; Robles A; Deverall P; Morris R; Jackson G; Sowton E J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Jul; 24(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 8006262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Waveform optimization for internal atrial defibrillation: effects of waveform rounding, phase duration, and voltage swing. Kidwai BJ; Allen JD; Harbinson MT; McIntyre A; Anderson J; Adgey AA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1198-207. PubMed ID: 11523604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Impact of electrical shock waveform and paddle positions on efficacy of direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation]. Stanaitiene G; Babarskiene RM Medicina (Kaunas); 2008; 44(9):665-72. PubMed ID: 18971603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks. Ricard P; Lévy S; Boccara G; Lakhal E; Bardy G Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 11333061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation: optimization of total pulse and second phase durations. Matula MH; Brooks MJ; Pan Q; Pless BD; Province RA; Echt DS Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 20(9 Pt 1):2154-62. PubMed ID: 9309738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transvenous cardioversion--a novel asymmetric rectangular biphasic waveform from a radiofrequency defibrillator compared with conventional waveforms in atrial fibrillation. Walsh Sj Sj; Manoharan G; Escalona Oj Oj; Evans N; Allen Jd Jd; Anderson JM; Adgey Aa Aa J Electrocardiol; 2003; 36 Suppl():191-2. PubMed ID: 14716632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing the efficacy and safety of a novel monophasic waveform delivered by the passive implantable atrial defibrillator with biphasic waveforms in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Manoharan G; Evans N; Allen D; Anderson J; Adgey J Circulation; 2004 Apr; 109(13):1686-92. PubMed ID: 15051642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical shock tolerability and effect of different right atrial electrode locations on efficacy of low energy human transvenous atrial defibrillation using an implantable lead system. Lok NS; Lau CP; Tse HF; Ayers GM J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 30(5):1324-30. PubMed ID: 9350935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low energy conversion of atrial fibrillation in the sheep. Powell AC; Garan H; McGovern BA; Fallon JT; Krishnan SC; Ruskin JN J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 20(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 1512352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transvenous internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: a randomized study on defibrillation threshold and tolerability of asymmetrical compared with symmetrical shocks. Boriani G; Biffi M; Zannoli R; Branzi A; Magnani B Int J Cardiol; 1999 Sep; 71(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 10522566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of monophasic with single and dual capacitor biphasic waveforms for nonthoracotomy canine internal defibrillation. Chapman PD; Vetter JW; Souza JJ; Wetherbee JN; Troup PJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Jul; 14(1):242-5. PubMed ID: 2738266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]