These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8491498)

  • 21. Accuracy of the London School of Hygiene and Remler M2000 sphygmomanometers.
    Fitzgerald DJ; O'Callaghan WG; O'Malley K; O'Brien ET
    Clin Sci (Lond); 1981 Dec; 61 Suppl 7():399s-401s. PubMed ID: 7318344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer versus the standard sphygmomanometer: an investigation of mechanisms.
    Kinirons MT; Maskrey VL; Lawson M; Swift CG; Jackson SH
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Jul; 9(7):571-3. PubMed ID: 7562887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. End digit preference in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic in southwest Nigeria.
    Ayodele OE; Sanya EO; Okunola OO; Akintunde AA
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2012 Mar; 23(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 22447477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Are automatic devices suitable for blood pressure determinations?].
    Adorjani C; Siegenthaler W; Vetter W
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1979 Sep; 109(33):1225-30. PubMed ID: 493912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of sphygmomanometer type and position of the arm on blood pressure measurement.
    Parr GD; Poole PH
    J Hum Hypertens; 1988 Oct; 2(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 3236319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical evaluation of Dinamap 845 automated blood pressure recorder.
    Silas JH; Barker AT; Ramsay LE
    Br Heart J; 1980 Feb; 43(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 7362713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lack of sphygmomanometer calibration causes over- and under-detection of hypertension: a computer simulation study.
    Turner MJ; Irwig L; Bune AJ; Kam PC; Baker AB
    J Hypertens; 2006 Oct; 24(10):1931-8. PubMed ID: 16957551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Smart blood pressure holter.
    İlhan İ
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():1-12. PubMed ID: 29428060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Validation of Heine Gamma G7 (G5) and XXL-LF aneroid devices for blood pressure measurement.
    Dorigatti F; Bonso E; Zanier A; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 17303985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Value of blood pressure of adults depending on method of measurement].
    Wielemborek-Musiał K; Jegier A
    Pol Arch Med Wewn; 2006 Jun; 115(6):529-34. PubMed ID: 17263224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Investigation of end-digit preference in blood pressure records of hospitalized chinese patients and analysis of risk factors.
    Jie G; Jian W; Qiaowen H; Shanzhu Z
    Postgrad Med; 2012 Mar; 124(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 22437215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automated blood pressure reading--its claims and its reliability.
    Ho TF; Yip WC; Tay JS
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1983 Oct; 12(4):606-8. PubMed ID: 6678140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sources of inaccuracy in the use of the Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer.
    McGurk C; Nugent A; McAuley D; Silke B
    J Hypertens; 1997 Dec; 15(12 Pt 1):1379-84. PubMed ID: 9431841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lax sphygmomanometer standard causes overdetection and underdetection of hypertension: a computer simulation study.
    Turner MJ; van Schalkwyk JM; Irwig L
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Apr; 13(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 18347443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
    Yu DM; Fu P; Yu WT; Guo HJ; Yang XG; Zhao WH; Zhao LY
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Anastas ZM; Jimerson E; Garolis S
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(6):519-24; quiz 525-6. PubMed ID: 18953216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparisons of blood pressure measurements by auscultation and Physiometrics Infrasonde recording techniques.
    van den Berg BJ
    Hypertension; 1980; 2(4 Pt 2):I8-17. PubMed ID: 7399640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.