These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8491498)

  • 41. Evaluating the use of a semiautomated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer in the hypertension clinic.
    Prasad N; Wheeldon NM; MacDonald TM
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(6):307-9. PubMed ID: 7848794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].
    Cao Q; Li D; Yu W; Guo Q; Zhao L; Yu D; Wang Y
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2016 Sep; 45(5):758-765. PubMed ID: 29903127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
    Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Validation of Oscillomat, a device for self-measurement of blood pressure. Comparison with mercury sphygmomanometers].
    Asmar R; Sassano P; Demolis P; Ménard J; Safar M
    Presse Med; 1991 Mar; 20(12):551-5. PubMed ID: 1827894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Random-zero sphygmomanometer, Rose's tape, and the accuracy of the blood pressure measurements in children.
    Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Uhari M
    Pediatr Res; 1992 Aug; 32(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 1508618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Feasibility of cuff-free measurement of systolic and diastolic arterial blood pressure.
    Masè M; Mattei W; Cucino R; Faes L; Nollo G
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 21353067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of a new portable electronic sphygmomanometer (Copal UA251) with the Hawksley random zero machine.
    Malatino LS; Brown WC
    Clin Exp Hypertens A; 1988; 10(4):589-96. PubMed ID: 3390962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of an oscillometric automatic blood pressure device: the Omron HEM403C.
    Walma EP; van Dooren C; van der Does E; Prins A; Mulder P; Hoes AW
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 9(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 7783097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical evaluation of the sphygmomat 2 semi-automatic blood pressure monitor.
    Prior AJ; Peck K; Davies P; Beevers DG
    J Med Eng Technol; 1990; 14(6):250-3. PubMed ID: 2283674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements.
    Midgley PC; Wardhaugh B; Macfarlane C; Magowan R; Kelnar CJ
    Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Validation of A&D UA-85X device for blood pressure measurement.
    Bonso E; Ragazzo F; Palatini P
    Blood Press Monit; 2008 Dec; 13(6):339-41. PubMed ID: 19020424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Blood pressure changes associated with tilting in normotensive subjects: differences in response pattern as measured by oscillometry and auscultation.
    Sidery MB; Macdonald IA
    Clin Auton Res; 1991 Jun; 1(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 1822764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the Vita-Stat automatic blood pressure recorder. A comparison with the Random-Zero sphygmomanometer.
    Whelton PK; Thompson SG; Barnes GR; Miall WE
    Am J Epidemiol; 1983 Jan; 117(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 6823952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Comparative study on electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in the field study].
    Yu D; Li D; Guo Q; Yu W; Xu X; Zhao L
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Nov; 44(6):914-7. PubMed ID: 26738382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Blood pressure monitoring with home monitors versus mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Rotch AL; Dean JO; Kendrach MG; Wright SG; Woolley TW
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001; 35(7-8):817-22. PubMed ID: 11485126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Simultaneous validation of the SunTech 247 diagnostic station blood pressure measurement device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol, the International Protocol and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standards.
    Polo Friz H; Facchetti R; Primitz L; Beltrame L; Galbiati V; Ricioppo A; Bombelli M; Sega R
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):222-7. PubMed ID: 19741510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Automated sphygmomanometer in spinal cord injured patients during head-up tilt: an evaluation.
    Hammond MC; Hinde JD; Rida W
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Jul; 68(7):430-3. PubMed ID: 3606366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Evaluation of an automatic sphygmomanometer].
    Slabý A; Arenberger P; Josífko M; Hrabák P
    Sb Lek; 1989 Sep; 91(8):274-84. PubMed ID: 2617128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study.
    Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R;
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.