These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8492400)

  • 1. Should unpublished data be included in meta-analyses? Current convictions and controversies.
    Cook DJ; Guyatt GH; Ryan G; Clifton J; Buckingham L; Willan A; McIlroy W; Oxman AD
    JAMA; 1993 Jun; 269(21):2749-53. PubMed ID: 8492400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A protocol for a systematic review on the impact of unpublished studies and studies published in the gray literature in meta-analyses.
    Schmucker C; Bluemle A; Briel M; Portalupi S; Lang B; Motschall E; Schwarzer G; Bassler D; Mueller KF; von Elm E; Meerpohl JJ;
    Syst Rev; 2013 May; 2():24. PubMed ID: 23634657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review finds that study data not published in full text articles have unclear impact on meta-analyses results in medical research.
    Schmucker CM; Blümle A; Schell LK; Schwarzer G; Oeller P; Cabrera L; von Elm E; Briel M; Meerpohl JJ;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176210. PubMed ID: 28441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association between pacifier use and breast-feeding, sudden infant death syndrome, infection and dental malocclusion.
    Callaghan A; Kendall G; Lock C; Mahony A; Payne J; Verrier L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2005 Jul; 3(6):147-67. PubMed ID: 21631747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
    Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews.
    Hartling L; Featherstone R; Nuspl M; Shave K; Dryden DM; Vandermeer B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28420349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methodological quality of Meta-analyses regarding studies related to genetic association on papers published in Chinese journals].
    Li S; Fang K; Sun AY; Sun KX; Hu YH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 34(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 24331971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?
    McAuley L; Pham B; Tugwell P; Moher D
    Lancet; 2000 Oct; 356(9237):1228-31. PubMed ID: 11072941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review articles and publication bias.
    Kleijnen J; Knipschild P
    Arzneimittelforschung; 1992 May; 42(5):587-91. PubMed ID: 1388359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to systematically review the medical literature.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1996 Jul; 115(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 8758631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Publication bias in psychological science: comment on Ferguson and Brannick (2012).
    Rothstein HR; Bushman BJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 22369520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grey literature in meta-analyses.
    Conn VS; Valentine JC; Cooper HM; Rantz MJ
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 12867783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality control in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Bown MJ; Sutton AJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 40(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 20732826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of review articles published in four anaesthesia journals.
    Smith AF
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):405-9. PubMed ID: 9104524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: publication bias perpetuated by meta-analyses.
    Vaitkus PT; Brar C
    Am Heart J; 2007 Feb; 153(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 17239689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An international survey indicated that unpublished systematic reviews exist.
    Tricco AC; Pham B; Brehaut J; Tetroe J; Cappelli M; Hopewell S; Lavis JN; Berlin JA; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):617-623.e5. PubMed ID: 19162440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
    van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.