133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8492588)
1. Regional mapping of incidence rates using spatial Bayesian models.
Cressie N
Med Care; 1993 May; 31(5 Suppl):YS60-5. PubMed ID: 8492588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variations research. The physician perspective.
Steinberg EP
Med Care; 1993 May; 31(5 Suppl):YS86-8. PubMed ID: 8492593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Further issues in small area variations analysis.
Stano M
J Health Polit Policy Law; 1991; 16(3):573-88. PubMed ID: 1761828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the policy role of the small area variations and physician practice style hypotheses.
Stano M
Health Policy; 1993 Apr; 24(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 10125815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On defining small areas.
Morrisey MA
Med Care; 1993 May; 31(5 Suppl):YS89-95. PubMed ID: 8492594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient practice variation. A call for research.
Longo DR
Med Care; 1993 May; 31(5 Suppl):YS81-5. PubMed ID: 8492592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Explaining geographic variations. The enthusiasm hypothesis.
Chassin MR
Med Care; 1993 May; 31(5 Suppl):YS37-44. PubMed ID: 8492584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Future directions for small area variations.
Wennberg JE
Med Care; 1993 May; 31(5 Suppl):YS75-80. PubMed ID: 8492591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient outcomes research teams: examples from a study on knee replacement.
Freund DA; Katz BP; Callahan CM
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():86-94; discussion 94-5. PubMed ID: 8192321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Geographic variation of procedure utilization. A hierarchical model approach.
Gatsonis C; Normand SL; Liu C; Morris C
Med Care; 1993 May; 31(5 Suppl):YS54-9. PubMed ID: 8492586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physician demand for leisure: implications for cesarean section rates.
Brown HS
J Health Econ; 1996 Apr; 15(2):233-42. PubMed ID: 10159111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A spatial analysis of county-level variation in hospitalization rates for low back problems in North Carolina.
Joines JD; Hertz-Picciotto I; Carey TS; Gesler W; Suchindran C
Soc Sci Med; 2003 Jun; 56(12):2541-53. PubMed ID: 12742616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ambiguous relationship between practice variation and appropriateness of care: an agenda for further research.
Casparie AF
Health Policy; 1996 Mar; 35(3):247-65. PubMed ID: 10157401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Malpractice and obstetric practice: the correlation of malpractice premiums to rates of vaginal and cesarean delivery.
Johnson CT; Choubey V; Satin AJ; Werner EF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):545-546. PubMed ID: 26767796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Cesarean delivery and Native American women.
Devitt NF
Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):86-7. PubMed ID: 16499538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cesarean section rates in Italy.
Signorelli C; Cattaruzza MS
Am J Public Health; 1994 Aug; 84(8):1340-1. PubMed ID: 8059904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Physician gender and cesarean sections.
Mitler LK; Rizzo JA; Horwitz SM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Oct; 53(10):1030-5. PubMed ID: 11027936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Small area variations: a critical review of propositions, methods, and evidence.
Folland S; Stano M
Med Care Rev; 1990; 47(4):419-65. PubMed ID: 10170813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery.
Baicker K; Buckles KS; Chandra A
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(5):w355-67. PubMed ID: 16895942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tasks in statistical inference for studying variation in medicine.
Rubin DB
Med Care; 1993 May; 31(5 Suppl):YS103-10. PubMed ID: 8492580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
