These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8493317)

  • 1. "Asleep on duty" record impacts delay in delivery case. Case in point: St. Paul Medical Center v. Cecil (842 S.W.2d 808--TX [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Mar; 33(10):2. PubMed ID: 8493317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "Implementing doctor's orders" is no defense. Case in point: Bremner v. Charles 859 P. 2d 1148--OR (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Dec; 34(7):4. PubMed ID: 8303033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert sets high standards for nurses in delivery death case. Case on point: McGrath v. Baylor University Medical Center, 2000 WL1222039 S.W.3d-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2000 Dec; 41(7):2. PubMed ID: 11995072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal distress: "Failure to call for help". Case in point: Fairfax Hosp. System, Inc. v. McCarty (419 S.E.2d 621--VA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Nov; 33(6):4. PubMed ID: 1302864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Live birth question: wrongful death action. Case in point: Wheeler v. Yettie Kersting Mem. Hosp. (761 S.W. 2d 785--TX (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):4. PubMed ID: 2704835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is medical chief's inquiry of nurse subject to peer review privilege? Case in point: Roach v. Springfield Clinic 623 N.E. 2d 246--IL (1992).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Jan; 34(8):2. PubMed ID: 8127971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure to "fully communicate": catastrophic results. Case in point: Baptist Medical Center v. Wilson 618 So. 2d 1335--AL (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1993 Aug; 34(3):2. PubMed ID: 8198619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nurse "fails to recall": blockbuster judgment. Case in point: Salas v. Wang (846 F. 2d 897--NJ 1988).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Aug; 29(3):2. PubMed ID: 3413281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are physicians "primed" by nurses?
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):1. PubMed ID: 1454992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nurses testify as hostile witnesses.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Apr; 28(11):1. PubMed ID: 3368574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Failure to determine breech position: M.D. or R.N. duty? Case in point: Alvis v. Henderson Obstetrics, S.C. (592 N.E.2d 678--[1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Sep; 33(4):4. PubMed ID: 1410395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nurse and the law. Informed consent and self-determination.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Aug; 22(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 1445015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. C-section delayed: accusations fly.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Mar; 29(10):1. PubMed ID: 2704833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can nurse "diagnose" arrest of labor? Case in point: Ewing v. Aubert (532 So. 2d 876--LA (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Jan; 29(8):2. PubMed ID: 2922482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nurse "pushed the baby back into the womb". Case in point: De Leon v. Hosp. of Albert Einstein Col. (566 N.Y.S 2d 213--NY 1991).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Apr; 31(11):2. PubMed ID: 2041872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can suit succeed after expiration of limitations? Case on point: Walters v. Cleveland Regional Medical Center, 08-0169 (3/12/2010) S.W.3d-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2010 Mar; 50(10):2. PubMed ID: 20499619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgeon attempts to blame nurses for sponge left in mastectomy patient. Case on point: Mitchell v. Baylor Univ. Med. Ctr., 2003 WL 21508493 S.W.3d-TX.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2003 Aug; 44(3):2. PubMed ID: 14508919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suit alleging RNs & MDs responsible for brain injury to newborn dismissed. Case on point: C.A. v. Bentolila, A-1261-11T1 NJSUP (8/9/2012)-NJ.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2012 Aug; 53(3):4. PubMed ID: 22997684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dr. refuses to treat pt. in active labor. Case in point: Burditt v. U. S. Dept. of Health & Human Serv. (932 F. 2d 1362--TX (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Sep; 32(4):2. PubMed ID: 1924823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nursing records "missing": spoilation of evidence. Case in point: Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in Wash. 881 P. 2d 304--AK (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):2. PubMed ID: 7838971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.