These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8493317)

  • 21. Nursing negligence not "superceding" cause of death. Case in point: Dent v. Perkins 629 So. 2d 1354--LA (1993).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Apr; 34(11):4. PubMed ID: 8184094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When nurses must question doctors' orders.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Feb; 28(9):1. PubMed ID: 3347755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Legal case briefs for nurses. PA: medicated pre-op patient falls: incident report excluded from evidence. CA: patient complains of "strange feeling": failure to communicate--brain damage results.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Feb; 34(9):3. PubMed ID: 8171192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. May you delay implementing Dr.'s orders? Case in point: Koeniguer v. Eckrich (422 N.W. 2d 600--SD (1988)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1988 Jul; 29(2):2. PubMed ID: 3406422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Failure to use fetal monitor & timely call physician. Case in point: Garcia v. Providence Medical Center (806 P. 2d 766--WA (1991)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 May; 31(12):4. PubMed ID: 1841401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are nurses held to same standards of care as physicians? Case in point: Alef v. Alta Bates Hospital (6 Cal Rptr. 2d 900-CA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Jun; 33(1):4. PubMed ID: 1626055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. "Substantial evidence" criteria needed to uphold verdict on appeal. Case in point: Silvis through Silvis v. Hobbs (824 P 2d. 1013--MT (1992)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Apr; 32(11):4. PubMed ID: 1603937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. RN removed FHR monitor to make room: $3.8 million verdict. CASE ON POINT: Long v. Wader, 2007 ALSC 1041887--08/31/07) So.2d-AL.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2008 Jan; 48(8):2. PubMed ID: 18330376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Should nurses have questioned dr.'s orders? Cerny V. Williams, No. 2004-10053 (09/19/2006) -NY.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2006 Oct; 47(5):4. PubMed ID: 17117603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stillborn released to intoxicated husband: outrage suit. Case in point: Neff v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. (799 S.W. 2d 795--AR (1990)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1991 Feb; 31(9):4. PubMed ID: 1852894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nurse and the law. Relying on the count.
    Langslow A
    Aust Nurses J; 1992 Jun; 21(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 1530515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Failure to timely report test results: cause of stillbirth? Case in point: Clancy v. Euclid General Hospital (584 N.E. 2d 763--OH (1989)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Mar; 32(10):2. PubMed ID: 1594770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nurses fail to "go over doctor's head": death results. Case in point: Strubhart v. Perry Mem. Hosp. Trus 903 P. 2d 263--OK (a995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1995 Nov; 36(6):4. PubMed ID: 8552757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. NY: summary judgment for Dr. denied: nurse 'recalled' his presence during birth. In Re Kreinheder, 2009-07060 (10/2/2009)-NY.
    Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2009 Oct; 50(5):3. PubMed ID: 19928311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is your patient complaining of "pain" or "burning"? Case in point: McLain v. Glenwood Reg. Medical Center (601 S.E. 2d 240--LA [1992]).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Oct; 33(5):4. PubMed ID: 1454995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Liability for failure to spot inconsistency in orders. Case in point: St. Germain v. Pfeifer 637 N.E.2d 848 MA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):2. PubMed ID: 7972845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failure to file suit timely: doctrine of Contra Non Valentem. Case in point: Wimberly v. Schumpert Med. Center 641 So. 2d 1016--LA (1994).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Dec; 35(7):4. PubMed ID: 7838973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Posey restrained pt. chokes--brain damage: immunity issue. Case in point: Allen v. Montgomery Hosp. 668 A. 2d 565--PA (1995).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1996 Feb; 36(9):4. PubMed ID: 8711129
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Legal case briefs for nurses. TX: infant pronounced dead is alive: parents' report of movement ignored; DE: difficulty in intubating cardiac arrest pt.: failure to properly qualify ICU staff.
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Sep; 35(4):3. PubMed ID: 7972846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nurse orders labor patient transferred: death results.
    Tammelleo JD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1994 Feb; 34(9):1. PubMed ID: 8171190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.