These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8493483)
1. Lip and nose morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate from four Scandinavian centres. Enemark H; Friede H; Paulin G; Semb G; Abyholm F; Bolund S; Lilja J; Ostrup L Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 1993; 27(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 8493483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Facial Aesthetic Outcomes of Cleft Surgery: Assessment of Discrete Lip and Nose Images Compared with Digital Symmetry Analysis. Deall CE; Kornmann NSS; Bella H; Wallis KL; Hardwicke JT; Su TL; Richard BM Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Oct; 138(4):855-862. PubMed ID: 27307335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nasolabial esthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after 1- versus 3-stage treatment protocols. Fudalej P; Katsaros C; Bongaarts C; Dudkiewicz Z; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1661-6. PubMed ID: 19615579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomized controlled trial comparing two techniques for unilateral cleft lip and palate: Growth and speech outcomes during mixed dentition. Ganesh P; Murthy J; Ulaghanathan N; Savitha VH J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 43(6):790-5. PubMed ID: 25958096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale for 18-Year-Old Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Tool for Nasolabial Aesthetics Assessment. Mulder FJ; Mosmuller DGM; de Vet HCW; Mouës CM; Breugem CC; van der Molen ABM; Don Griot JPW Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Aug; 55(7):1006-1012. PubMed ID: 27996297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel computer system for the evaluation of nasolabial morphology, symmetry and aesthetics after cleft lip and palate treatment. Part 2: Comparative anthropometric analysis of patients with repaired unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and healthy individuals. Pietruski P; Majak M; Pawlowska E; Skiba A; Antoszewski B J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 45(4):505-514. PubMed ID: 28258919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of two scoring systems in the assessment of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients. Mosmuller DG; Bijnen CL; Don Griot JP; Kramer GJ; Disse MA; Prahl C; Kuik DJ; Niessen FB J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1222-5. PubMed ID: 24978682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional assessment methods of nasolabial appearance in cleft lip and palate patients: Do the assessment methods measure the same outcome? Mosmuller DGM; Maal TJ; Prahl C; Tan RA; Mulder FJ; Schwirtz RMF; de Vet HCW; Bergé SJ; Don Griot JPW J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1220-1226. PubMed ID: 28552202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between facial morphology and esthetics in patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Russell KA; Orthod D; Tompson B; Orthod D; Paedo D Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2009 May; 46(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 19642746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effects of Secondary Cleft Procedures on Alar Base Position and Nostril Morphology in Patients with Unilateral Clefts. Power SM; Matic DB Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):431-435. PubMed ID: 27104987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early bone grafting in complete cleft lip and palate cases following maxillofacial orthopedics. VI. Assessments from photographs and anthropometric measurements. Larson O; Nilsson B Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg; 1983; 17(3):209-23. PubMed ID: 6673088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rating nasolabial appearance on three-dimensional images in cleft lip and palate: a comparison with standard photographs. Stebel A; Desmedt D; Bronkhorst E; Kuijpers MA; Fudalej PS Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 25900054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Primary correction of lip and nose abnormalities in complete unilateral cleft. 1: Lip reconstruction]. Mommaerts MY Acta Stomatol Belg; 1993 Dec; 90(4):235-49. PubMed ID: 8191962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Development of the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale: A New Rating Scale for the Assessment of Nasolabial Appearance in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients. Mosmuller DGM; Mennes LM; Prahl C; Kramer GJC; Disse MA; van Couwelaar GM; Niessen FB; Griot JPWD Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Sep; 54(5):555-561. PubMed ID: 27537493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Four-dimensional changes of nasolabial positions in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Xu Y; Li J; Zhao S; Shi B; Zheng Q; Wang Y; Lo LJ J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 23524719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of lip revision surgery on nasolabial esthetics in patients with cleft lip. Mercado AM; Phillips C; Vig KW; Trotman CA Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 Nov; 17(4):216-25. PubMed ID: 24846148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nasal morphology and shape parameters as predictors of nasal esthetics in individuals with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Russell KA; Waldman SD; Tompson B; Lee JM Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Sep; 38(5):476-85. PubMed ID: 11522169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nasolabial aesthetics of patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: A comparison of three rating methods in two countries. Nguyen VT; Nguyen T; Jagomägi T J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 46(8):1385-1389. PubMed ID: 29861405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aesthetic evaluation of the nasolabial region in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate comparing expert versus nonexperience health professionals. Paiva TS; Andre M; Paiva WS; Mattos BS Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():460106. PubMed ID: 25126560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]