151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8494233)
1. Assessment of interlaboratory variability of immunophenotyping. Results of the College of American Pathologists Flow Cytometry Survey.
Homburger HA; Rosenstock W; Paxton H; Paton ML; Landay AL
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Mar; 677():43-9. PubMed ID: 8494233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved precision in the enumeration of absolute numbers of lymphocyte phenotypes with long-term monthly proficiency testing.
Rickman WJ; Monical C; Waxdal MJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Mar; 677():53-8. PubMed ID: 8494246
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. National external quality assessment scheme for lymphocyte immunophenotyping in Belgium.
Van Blerk M; Bernier M; Bossuyt X; Chatelain B; D'Hautcourt JL; Demanet C; Kestens L; Van Bockstaele D; Crucitti T; Libeer JC
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Mar; 41(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 12705342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analyses of quality assessment studies using CD45 for gating lymphocytes for CD3(+)4(+)%.
Gelman R; Wilkening C
Cytometry; 2000 Feb; 42(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10679736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Immunology Quality Assessment Proficiency Testing Program for CD3⁺4⁺ and CD3⁺8⁺ lymphocyte subsets: a ten year review via longitudinal mixed effects modeling.
Bainbridge J; Wilkening CL; Rountree W; Louzao R; Wong J; Perza N; Garcia A; Denny TN
J Immunol Methods; 2014 Jul; 409():82-90. PubMed ID: 24911327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction of interlaboratory variability in flow cytometric immunophenotyping by standardization of instrument set-up and calibration, and standard list mode data analysis.
Gratama JW; Kraan J; Adriaansen H; Hooibrink B; Levering W; Reinders P; Van den Beemd MW; Van der Holt B; Bolhuis RL
Cytometry; 1997 Feb; 30(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 9056737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of lyophilized human cells as antigenic controls for flow cytometry measurements.
Maples JA
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Mar; 677():420-1. PubMed ID: 8494230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of clinical standards for flow cytometry.
Schwartz A; Fernández-Repollet E
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Mar; 677():28-39. PubMed ID: 8388180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reference intervals of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD4/CD8, and absolute CD4 values in Asian and Non-Asian populations.
Howard RR; Fasano CS; Frey L; Miller CH
Cytometry; 1996 Sep; 26(3):231-2. PubMed ID: 8889397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality control in immunophenotyping: U.S. efforts to establish common methodology and their impact. American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics.
Nicholson JK
Eur J Histochem; 1994; 38 Suppl 1():7-12. PubMed ID: 8547714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of the effects of instrumentation, monoclonal antibody, and fluorochrome on flow cytometric immunophenotyping: a report based on 2 years of the NIAID DAIDS flow cytometry quality assessment program.
Gelman R; Cheng SC; Kidd P; Waxdal M; Kagan J
Clin Immunol Immunopathol; 1993 Feb; 66(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 7680972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control in flow cytometry for diagnostic pathology: II. A conspectus of reference ranges for lymphocyte immunophenotyping.
McCoy JP; Overton WR
Cytometry; 1994 Sep; 18(3):129-39. PubMed ID: 7813333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of variation in results of flow cytometric lymphocyte immunophenotyping in a multicenter study.
Gratama JW; Kraan J; Van den Beemd R; Hooibrink B; Van Bockstaele DR; Hooijkaas H
Cytometry; 1997 Aug; 30(4):166-77. PubMed ID: 9298834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nationwide quality control trial on lymphocyte immunophenotyping and flow cytometer performance in Italy.
Brando B; Sommaruga E
Cytometry; 1993; 14(3):294-306. PubMed ID: 8472606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Centers for Disease Control programs in flow cytometric immunophenotyping.
Gerber AR
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Mar; 677():40-2. PubMed ID: 8388182
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality control in immunophenotyping. Use of human CD4+ and CD8+ T clones as standards.
Kunkl A; Valle MT; Fenoglio D; Manca F
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Mar; 677():417-9. PubMed ID: 8494229
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of interlaboratory variability in analytical cytology. Results of the College of American Pathologists Flow Cytometry Study.
Homburger HA; McCarthy R; Deodhar S
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 Jun; 113(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 2658910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interlaboratory quality assessment of lymphocyte phenotyping. Etalonorme 1990-1992 surveys.
Goguel AF; Crainic K; Ducailar A; Ouin M
Biol Cell; 1993; 78(1-2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8220229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. First proposed panels on acute leukemia for four-color immunophenotyping by flow cytometry from the Brazilian group of flow cytometry-GBCFLUX.
Ikoma MR; Sandes AF; Thiago LS; Cavalcanti Júnior GB; Lorand-Metze IG; Costa ES; Pimenta G; Santos-Silva MC; Bacal NS; Yamamoto M; Souto EX;
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2015; 88(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 24753208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interlaboratory variability of CD8 subset measurements by flow cytometry and its applications to multicenter clinical trials. NAID/NICHD Women and Infants Transmission Study Group.
Landay AL; Brambilla D; Pitt J; Hillyer G; Golenbock D; Moye J; Landesman S; Kagan J
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol; 1995 Jul; 2(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 7583925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
