These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8494831)

  • 1. Labour induction policy in hospitals of different levels of specialisation.
    Järvelin MR; Hartikainen-Sorri AL; Rantakallio P
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Apr; 100(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 8494831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Induction of twin pregnancy and the risk of caesarean delivery: a cohort study.
    Jonsson M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Jun; 15():136. PubMed ID: 26077416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births.
    Davey MA; King J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Apr; 16():92. PubMed ID: 27121614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variation in hospital caesarean section rates and obstetric outcomes among nulliparae at term: a population-based cohort study.
    Nippita TA; Lee YY; Patterson JA; Ford JB; Morris JM; Nicholl MC; Roberts CL
    BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):702-11. PubMed ID: 25605625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does an elective induction policy negatively impact on vaginal delivery rates? A 30-month review of an elective induction policy.
    Loktionov D; McCarthy CM; Skehan MC
    Ir J Med Sci; 2019 May; 188(2):563-567. PubMed ID: 30121814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of labour induction on the risk of caesarean delivery: using propensity scores to control confounding by indication.
    Danilack VA; Dore DD; Triche EW; Muri JH; Phipps MG; Savitz DA
    BJOG; 2016 Aug; 123(9):1521-9. PubMed ID: 26411752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of caesarean section after induced labour: do hospitals make a difference?
    Teixeira C; Correia S; Barros H
    BMC Res Notes; 2013 May; 6():214. PubMed ID: 23714240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elective induction of labour increases caesarean section rate in low risk multiparous women.
    Jacquemyn Y; Michiels I; Martens G
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 32(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 22369399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction at 41 weeks increases the risk of caesarean section in a hospital with a low rate of caesarean sections.
    Burgos J; Rodríguez L; Otero B; Cobos P; Osuna C; Centeno Mdel M; Melchor JC; Fernández-Llebrez L; Martínez-Astorquiza T
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1716-8. PubMed ID: 22339273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Uterine rupture after induction of labour in women with previous caesarean section.
    Kayani SI; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):451-5. PubMed ID: 15777443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intrapartum caesarean rates differ significantly between ethnic groups--relationship to induction.
    Ismail KI; Marchocki Z; Brennan DJ; O'Donoghue K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Oct; 158(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 21733613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal childbirth experience and induction of labour in each mode of delivery: a retrospective seven-year cohort study of 95,051 parturients in Finland.
    Joensuu JM; Saarijärvi H; Rouhe H; Gissler M; Ulander VM; Heinonen S; Torkki P; Mikkola TS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jun; 22(1):508. PubMed ID: 35739476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pregnancies past the estimated date of confinement: labour and delivery outcome.
    Al-Taani M
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003; 9(5-6):955-60. PubMed ID: 16450525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of induction of labour in nulliparous women at 38 to 39 weeks pregnancy by clinical indication: An observational study.
    de Vries BS; Barratt A; McGeechan K; Tooher J; Wong E; Phipps H; Gordon A; Hyett JA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59(4):484-492. PubMed ID: 30588611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Indication for labour induction and predictors for failed induction at KMCTH.
    Rayamajhi RT; Karki C; Shrestha N; Padhye SM
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2009; 7(25):21-5. PubMed ID: 19483448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation.
    Kotaska A; Menticoglou S; Gagnon R;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Jun; 31(6):557-566. PubMed ID: 19646324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An audit about labour induction, using prostaglandin, in women with a scarred uterus.
    Cogan A; Barlow P; Benali N; Murillo D; Manigart Y; Belhomme J; Rozenberg S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1399-406. PubMed ID: 22836816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Timing induction of labour at 41 or 42 weeks? A closer look at time frames of comparison: A review.
    Keulen JKJ; Bruinsma A; Kortekaas JC; van Dillen J; van der Post JAM; de Miranda E
    Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():111-118. PubMed ID: 30170263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vaginal misoprostol induction of labour: a Nigerian hospital experience.
    Ezechi OC; Kalu BK; Njokanma FO; Nwokoro CA; Okeke GC
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 15203615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
    Christensen LF; Overgaard C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.