These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. A comprehensive physical image quality evaluation of a selenium based digital x-ray imaging system for thorax radiography. Launders JH; Kengyelics SM; Cowen AR Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):986-97. PubMed ID: 9650189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Digital luminescence radiography. Part 1: Basic principle, technical execution and clinical use]. Döhring W; Urbach D Fortschr Med; 1991 Oct; 109(30):610-5. PubMed ID: 1761263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system. Efstathopoulos EP; Benekos O; Molfetas M; Charou E; Kottou S; Argentos S; Kelekis NL Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):291-7. PubMed ID: 16464840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Digital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns. Cohen MD; Katz BP; Kalasinski LA; White SJ; Smith JA; Long B Radiology; 1991 Dec; 181(3):829-32. PubMed ID: 1947105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Technical advances in chest radiography. MacMahon H; Vyborny C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1049-59. PubMed ID: 7976874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography. Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose. Seibert JA Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Digital image intensifier radiography--one year's experience with a Polytron system]. Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 2552516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique. MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Developments in digital radiography: an equipment update. James JJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR; O'Connor PJ Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(12):2616-26. PubMed ID: 11734969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics. Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study. Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computed radiography: its impact on radiographers. Cesar LJ Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 9008016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Direct digitization of optical images using a photostimulable phosphor system. Dobbins JT; Chotas HG; Benveniste H Med Phys; 1992; 19(4):1071-80. PubMed ID: 1518470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]