136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8496031)
1. The effect of irreversible image compression on diagnostic accuracy in thoracic imaging.
Aberle DR; Gleeson F; Sayre JW; Brown K; Batra P; Young DA; Stewart BK; Ho BK; Huang HK
Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):398-403. PubMed ID: 8496031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression.
Savcenko V; Erickson BJ; Palisson PM; Persons KR; Manduca A; Hartman TE; Harms GF; Brown LR
Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):609-16. PubMed ID: 9494474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography.
MacMahon H; Doi K; Sanada S; Montner SM; Giger ML; Metz CE; Nakamori N; Yin FF; Xu XW; Yonekawa H
Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1984299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image compression and chest radiograph interpretation: image perception comparison between uncompressed chest radiographs and chest radiographs stored using 10:1 JPEG compression.
Beall DP; Shelton PD; Kinsey TV; Horton MC; Fortman BJ; Achenbach S; Smirnoff V; Courneya DL; Carpenter B; Gironda JT
J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10847358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of CRT monitor display for personal computer in the detection of small lung nodules: with particular emphasis on comparison between JPEG and wavelet compression].
Kihara Y
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Apr; 61(5):231-7. PubMed ID: 11398347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images.
Slasky BS; Gur D; Good WF; Costa-Greco MA; Harris KM; Cooperstein LA; Rockette HE
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):775-80. PubMed ID: 2305061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of subtle interstitial abnormalities of the lungs on digitized chest radiographs: acceptable data compression ratios.
Kido S; Ikezoe J; Kondoh H; Takeuchi N; Johkoh T; Kohno N; Tomiyama N; Naito H; Arisawa J; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 8659352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation.
Slone RM; Foos DH; Whiting BR; Muka E; Rubin DA; Pilgram TK; Kohm KS; Young SS; Ho P; Hendrickson DD
Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):543-53. PubMed ID: 10796938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital storage phosphor chest radiography: an ROC study of the effect of 2K versus 4K matrix size on observer performance.
Miró SP; Leung AN; Rubin GD; Choi YH; Kee ST; Mindelzun RE; Stark P; Wexler L; Plevritis SK; Betts BJ
Radiology; 2001 Feb; 218(2):527-32. PubMed ID: 11161174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: an ROC study.
Hayrapetian A; Aberle DR; Huang HK; Fiske R; Morioka C; Valentino D; Boechat MI
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May; 152(5):1113-8. PubMed ID: 2705346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Digital radiography: optimization of chest radiographs using a modified exposure control].
Reichelt S; Oestmann JW; Prokop M; Hagemann G; Knüpfer W; Galanski M
Rofo; 1991 Feb; 154(2):155-8. PubMed ID: 1847538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The study of diagnostic accuracy of chest nodules by using different compression methods.
Zhigang L; Kuncheng LI; Jinghong Z; Shuliang L
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):255-7. PubMed ID: 16036156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of irreversible compression of digitized posterior-anterior chest radiographs.
Erickson BJ; Manduca A; Persons KR; Earnest F; Hartman TE; Harms GF; Brown LR
J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3):97-102. PubMed ID: 9268903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of compression ratios using JPEG2000 on computed radiography chest images.
Sung MM; Kim HJ; Yoo SK; Choi BW; Nam JE; Kim HS; Lee JH; Yoo HS
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Jun; 15(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 12297972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparison of LCD and CRT monitors for detection of pulmonary nodules and interstitial lung diseases on digital chest radiographs by using receiver operating characteristic analysis].
Ikeda R; Katsuragawa S; Shimonobou T; Hiai Y; Hashida M; Awai K; Yamashita Y; Doi K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 May; 62(5):734-41. PubMed ID: 16733502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of lung nodules on digital chest radiographs: potential usefulness of a new contralateral subtraction technique.
Tsukuda S; Heshiki A; Katsuragawa S; Li Q; MacMahon H; Doi K
Radiology; 2002 Apr; 223(1):199-203. PubMed ID: 11930067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An ROC study of chest radiographs: 2K Versus 4K high-resolution soft-copy images.
Kim SY; Hwang YJ; Han YH; Seo JW; Lee JY; Kim YH; Cha SJ; Hur G; Lee SS
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Dec; 20(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 17191100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved pulmonary nodule detection with scanning equalization radiography.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB; McFaul JA
Radiology; 1988 Oct; 169(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3420264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.
Schalekamp S; van Ginneken B; Meiss L; Peters-Bax L; Quekel LG; Snoeren MM; Tiehuis AM; Wittenberg R; Karssemeijer N; Schaefer-Prokop CM
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2399-405. PubMed ID: 24113431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
