116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8496033)
1. Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography. The hybrid cassette revisited.
Wilson AJ; West OC
Invest Radiol; 1993 May; 28(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 8496033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the injured cervical spine: comparison of conventional and storage phosphor radiography with a hybrid cassette.
Wilson AJ; Mann FA; West OC; McEnery KW; Murphy WA
Radiology; 1994 Nov; 193(2):419-22. PubMed ID: 7972756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-exposure conventional and computed radiography image acquisition.
Chotas HG; Dobbins JT; Floyd CE; Ravin CE
Invest Radiol; 1991 May; 26(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 2055742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed radiography: photostimulable phosphor image plate technology.
Long BW
Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 2587727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
Ludwig K; Ahlers K; Wormanns D; Freund M; Bernhardt TM; Diederich S; Heindel W
Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High-resolution digital imaging with storage phosphors.
Fuhrman CR; Gur D; Schaetzing R
J Thorac Imaging; 1990 Jan; 5(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 2299699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of image quality in portal imaging using a combination of a storage phosphor plate and diagnostic cassette.
Fujita H; Yamaguchi M; Fujioka T; Fukuda H; Murase K
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):504-8. PubMed ID: 19153183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
Ikezoe J; Kohno N; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Johkoh T; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):343-50. PubMed ID: 15789578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality of digital pre-implant tomography: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose.
Ekestubbe A; Gröndahl HG; Molander B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 14709608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conventional screen/film vs reduced exposure photostimulable phosphor plate imaging in lower extremity venography: an ROC analysis.
Siegel EL; Cook LT; Parsa MB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 May; 156(5):1095-9. PubMed ID: 2017933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
Farman TT; Farman AG
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative speeds of Kodak computed radiography phosphors and screen-film systems.
Huda W; Rill LN; Bruner AP
Med Phys; 1997 Oct; 24(10):1621-8. PubMed ID: 9350716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new needle-crystalline computed radiography detector.
Leblans P; Struye L; Willems P
J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):117-20. PubMed ID: 10847378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
