BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8497213)

  • 1. Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
    Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):293-8. PubMed ID: 8497213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.
    Huq MS; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):26-35. PubMed ID: 1901129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.
    Hunt MA; Malik S; Thomason C; Masterson ME
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):806-13. PubMed ID: 6439991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mean energy, energy-range relationships and depth-scaling factors for clinical electron beams.
    Ding GX; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Mar; 23(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 8815379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of AAPM Addendum to TG-51, IAEA TRS-398, and JSMP 12: Calibration of photon beams in water.
    Kinoshita N; Oguchi H; Nishimoto Y; Adachi T; Shioura H; Kimura H; Doi K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):271-278. PubMed ID: 28771919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculation of stopping-power ratios using realistic clinical electron beams.
    Ding GX; Rogers DW; Mackie TR
    Med Phys; 1995 May; 22(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 7643785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The calibration and use of plane-parallel ionization chambers for dosimetry of electron beams: an extension of the 1983 AAPM protocol report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 39.
    Almond PR; Attix FH; Humphries LJ; Kubo H; Nath R; Goetsch S; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 1994 Aug; 21(8):1251-60. PubMed ID: 7799867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The calibration of plane parallel ionisation chambers for the measurement of absorbed dose in electron beams of low to medium energies. Part 1: the NACP chamber.
    Cross P; Freeman N
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Sep; 19(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 8936730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the recommendations of the TG-25 protocol for determination of depth dose curves for electron beams using ionization chambers.
    Huq MS; Agostinelli AG; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1995 Aug; 22(8):1333-7. PubMed ID: 7476721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. kQ factors for ionization chamber dosimetry in clinical proton beams.
    Vatnitsky SM; Siebers JV; Miller DW
    Med Phys; 1996 Jan; 23(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 8700030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified calibration protocols in electron beam dosimetry: comparison with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.
    Yulinar C; Assegab MI; Wibowo WE; Pawiro SA
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Jul; 9(5):. PubMed ID: 37442101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The protocols and codes of practice used for the determination of absorbed dose in megavoltage photon and electron beams.
    Weatherburn H; Nisbet A
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1991; 19(2-3):147-80. PubMed ID: 1769240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of dose calibration by ionometric and chemical dosimetry for 6- and 45-MV x-ray beams.
    Zwicker RD; Wu A; Sternick ES
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1251-3. PubMed ID: 1753913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results of photon absorbed-dose measurements using the AAPM TG-21 protocol for accelerating potentials up to 26 MV.
    Hazle JD; Kirby TH; Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1234-6. PubMed ID: 1753909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small-beam calibration by 0.6- and 0.2-cm3 ionization chambers.
    Engler MJ; Jones GL
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(6):822-6. PubMed ID: 6439992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How water equivalent are water-equivalent solid materials for output calibration of photon and electron beams?
    Tello VM; Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1177-89. PubMed ID: 7565393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proton dosimetry intercomparison.
    Vatnitsky S; Siebers J; Miller D; Moyers M; Schaefer M; Jones D; Vynckier S; Hayakawa Y; Delacroix S; Isacsson U; Medin J; Kacperek A; Lomax A; Coray A; Kluge H; Heese J; Verhey L; Daftari I; Gall K; Lam G; Beck T; Hartmann G
    Radiother Oncol; 1996 Nov; 41(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 9004361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A multicenter study of modified electron beam output calibration.
    Mahfirotin DA; Ferliano B; Handika AD; Asril YS; Fadli M; Ryangga D; Nelly N; Kurniawan E; Wibowo WE; Yadav P; Pawiro SA
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 25(1):e14232. PubMed ID: 38088260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.
    Castrillón SV; Henríquez FC
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 10(1):136-146. PubMed ID: 19223831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of chemical and ionization dosimetry for high-energy x-ray and electron beams.
    Durocher JJ; Boese H; Cormack DV; Holloway AF
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 6798385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.