BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8497236)

  • 1. Filter wheel equalization in DSA: simulation results.
    Boone JM; Gardiner GA; Levin DC
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):439-48. PubMed ID: 8497236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Area x-ray beam equalization for digital angiography.
    Molloi S; Tang J; Mather T; Zhou Y
    Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2684-92. PubMed ID: 10619254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography.
    Gkanatsios NA; Huda W; Peters KR
    Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Filter wheel equalization for chest radiography: a computer simulation.
    Boone JM; Duryea J; Steiner RM
    Med Phys; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1029-37. PubMed ID: 7565377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimization of beam parameters for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 8177154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography.
    Zhang LJ; Wu SY; Niu JB; Zhang ZL; Wang HZ; Zhao YE; Chai X; Zhou CS; Lu GM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20028901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR angiography with three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.
    Frayne R; Grist TM; Korosec FR; Willig DS; Swan JS; Turski PA; Mistretta CA
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Dec; 8(6):366-88. PubMed ID: 9402678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A correlated noise reduction algorithm for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
    McCollough CH; Van Lysel MS; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(6):873-80. PubMed ID: 2586373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frameless neuronavigation based only on 3D digital subtraction angiography using surface-based facial registration.
    Stidd DA; Wewel J; Ghods AJ; Munich S; Serici A; Keigher KM; Theessen H; Moftakhar R; Lopes DK
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Sep; 121(3):745-50. PubMed ID: 25036204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automation system of X-ray filter in digital subtraction angiography.
    Akaishi T
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1998; 57(1-2):111-4. PubMed ID: 9804007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A theoretical comparison of x-ray angiographic image quality using energy-dependent and conventional subtraction methods.
    Tanguay J; Kim HK; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 22225282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Method for reducing noise in X-ray images by averaging pixels based on the normalized difference with the relevant pixel.
    Nishiki M; Shiraishi K; Sakaguchi T; Nambu K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2008 Jul; 1(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 20821146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Noninvasive digital energy subtraction angiography with a channeling-radiation x-ray source.
    Gary CK; Piestrup MA; Boyers DG; Pincus CI; Pantell RH; Rothbart GB
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(5):1527-35. PubMed ID: 8289737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classification-based summation of cerebral digital subtraction angiography series for image post-processing algorithms.
    Schuldhaus D; Spiegel M; Redel T; Polyanskaya M; Struffert T; Hornegger J; Doerfler A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Mar; 56(6):1791-802. PubMed ID: 21346277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a noise reduction imaging technology in iliac digital subtraction angiography: noninferior clinical image quality with lower patient and scatter dose.
    van Strijen MJ; Grünhagen T; Mauti M; Zähringer M; Gaines PA; Robinson GJ; Railton NJ; van Overhagen H; Habraken J; van Leersum M
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2015 May; 26(5):642-50.e1. PubMed ID: 25770373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear geometric warping of the mask image: a new method for reducing misregistration artifacts in digital subtraction angiography.
    Hayashi N; Sakai T; Kitagawa M; Inagaki R; Sadato N; Ishii Y; Nishimoto Y; Tanaka M; Fukushima T; Komuro H; Ogura H; Kobayashi H; Kubota T
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1998; 21(2):138-41. PubMed ID: 9502681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Design and development of the DSA digital subtraction workstation].
    Peng WX; Peng TZ; Xia SR; Jin GB
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2008 May; 32(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 18754423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
    Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
    Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimized radiographic spectra for small animal digital subtraction angiography.
    Lin MD; Samei E; Badea CT; Yoshizumi TT; Johnson GA
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4249-57. PubMed ID: 17153403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of standard- and low-tube voltage 320-detector row volume CT angiography in detection of intracranial aneurysms with digital subtraction angiography as gold standard.
    Sun G; Ding J; Lu Y; Li M; Li L; Li GY; Zhang XP
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 22206609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.