These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8497602)

  • 1. Breast imaging and the standard of care for the symptomatic patient.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):608-11. PubMed ID: 8497602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast imaging and the symptomatic patient: enough with the "diagnostic" mammography.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1423; author reply 1423-4. PubMed ID: 14573450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of US in breast imaging.
    Jackson VP
    Radiology; 1990 Nov; 177(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 2217759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Value of palpation findings in breast examination].
    Mühlberger G; Lauth G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Nov; 53(11):772-5. PubMed ID: 8293942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Importance of quality breast imaging in symptomatic women.
    Burak WE; Lerner AG
    Radiology; 2002 Mar; 222(3):856; author reply 856-7. PubMed ID: 11867813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammography and sonography in young symptomatic women.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Nov; 181(5):1424; author reply 1424-5. PubMed ID: 14573451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problem-solving ultrasound.
    Mendelson EB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):909-18, vii. PubMed ID: 15337424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative predictive value of breast imaging in patients with palpable lesions.
    Hall FM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):1073; author reply 1073-4. PubMed ID: 12239070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usefulness of mammography and sonography in women less than 35 years of age.
    Bassett LW; Ysrael M; Gold RH; Ysrael C
    Radiology; 1991 Sep; 180(3):831-5. PubMed ID: 1871302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
    Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical breast examination.
    Fletcher SW; O'Malley MS
    Hosp Pract (Off Ed); 1986 May; 21(5A):80, 82-4, 89. PubMed ID: 3084523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sonography in palpable breast tumours. Comparison with palpation, thermography and X-ray mammography.
    Laine H; Harjula A; Tallroth K
    J Belge Radiol; 1985; 68(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 3894324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: a review of 71 lesions.
    Macksood MJ
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1984 Feb; 83(6):432-4. PubMed ID: 6706713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Contribution of mammography to the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
    Hermanutz KD
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1974 Oct; 99(43):2180-2. PubMed ID: 4430279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rationale for a diagnostic chain in gestational breast tumor diagnosis.
    Bock K; Hadji P; Ramaswamy A; Schmidt S; Duda VF
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Mar; 273(6):337-45. PubMed ID: 16311748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnosis of palpable lesions of the breast. Our experience with real-time echography].
    Rizzi B; Politi U; Di Sclafani E; Appiani S; Lavorato F
    Minerva Ginecol; 1984 Oct; 36(10):583-6. PubMed ID: 6098868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA enhancement: comparison with mammography and ultrasonography.
    Hachiya J; Seki T; Okada M; Nitatori T; Korenaga T; Furuya Y
    Radiat Med; 1991; 9(6):232-40. PubMed ID: 1668410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
    Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technologic considerations for breast tumor size assessment.
    Davis PL; McCarty KS
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):623-31. PubMed ID: 7489313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tissue markers help clarify breast image correlation.
    Kaiser CP
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Dec; 22(12):19. PubMed ID: 11146798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.