142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8497625)
1. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.
Dao TH; Rahmouni A; Campana F; Laurent M; Asselain B; Fourquet A
Radiology; 1993 Jun; 187(3):751-5. PubMed ID: 8497625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the female pelvis: differentiation with MR imaging at 1.5 T.
Ebner F; Kressel HY; Mintz MC; Carlson JA; Cohen EK; Schiebler M; Gefter W; Axel L
Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):333-40. PubMed ID: 3422025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients.
Gilles R; Guinebretière JM; Shapeero LG; Lesnik A; Contesso G; Sarrazin D; Masselot J; Vanel D
Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):473-8. PubMed ID: 8327700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnosis of local breast cancer recurrences by magnetic resonance imaging].
Gilles R; Thiollier S; Guinebretière JM; Petit JY; Contesso G; Rochard F; Tardivon AA; Bittoun J; Arriagada R; Vanel D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1995; 24(8):788-93. PubMed ID: 8636610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast neoplasms: T2* susceptibility-contrast, first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kuhl CK; Bieling H; Gieseke J; Ebel T; Mielcarek P; Far F; Folkers P; Elevelt A; Schild HH
Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 8988196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of tumor control in patients with cervical cancer: analysis of combined volume and dynamic enhancement pattern by MR imaging.
Mayr NA; Yuh WT; Zheng J; Ehrhardt JC; Magnotta VA; Sorosky JI; Pelsang RE; Oberley LW; Hussey DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 9423627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions.
Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The indeterminate breast mass: assessment using contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Hickman PF; Moore NR; Shepstone BJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jan; 67(793):14-20. PubMed ID: 8298869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast lesions: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging and with T2*-weighted first-pass perfusion MR imaging.
Kvistad KA; Rydland J; Vainio J; Smethurst HB; Lundgren S; Fjøsne HE; Haraldseth O
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):545-53. PubMed ID: 10924584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer.
Whitehouse GH; Moore NR
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 7489311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation between recurrent tumor and benign conditions after treatment of gynecologic pelvic carcinoma: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging.
Kinkel K; Ariche M; Tardivon AA; Spatz A; Castaigne D; Lhomme C; Vanel D
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 9205223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spectral presaturation inversion recovery MR imaging sequence after gadolinium injection to differentiate fibrotic scar tissue and neoplastic strands in the mesorectal fat in patients undergoing restaging of rectal carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemo- and radiation therapy.
Quaia E; Ulcigrai V; Coss M; De Paoli L; Ukmar M; Zanconati F; De Pellegrin A; De Manzini N; Cova MA
Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1365-75. PubMed ID: 21971257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with breast conservative therapy.
Viehweg P; Heinig A; Lampe D; Buchmann J; Heywang-Köbrunner SH
MAGMA; 1998 Dec; 7(3):141-52. PubMed ID: 10050940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of multiple myeloma involving the spine: efficacy of fat-suppression and contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Rahmouni A; Divine M; Mathieu D; Golli M; Dao TH; Jazaerli N; Anglade MC; Reyes F; Vasile N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):1049-52. PubMed ID: 8470574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation fibrosis: differentiation from recurrent tumor by MR imaging.
Glazer HS; Lee JK; Levitt RG; Heiken JP; Ling D; Totty WG; Balfe DM; Emani B; Wasserman TH; Murphy WA
Radiology; 1985 Sep; 156(3):721-6. PubMed ID: 4023233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and fat suppressed magnetic resonance imaging in suspected recurrent carcinoma of the breast: preliminary experience.
Kerslake RW; Fox JN; Carleton PJ; Imrie MJ; Cook AM; Bowsley SJ; Horsman A
Br J Radiol; 1994 Dec; 67(804):1158-68. PubMed ID: 7874413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery.
Boné B; Aspelin P; Isberg B; Perbeck L; Veress B
Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Magnetic resonance mammography in suspected tumor recurrences].
Melani E; Sardanelli F; Ottonello C; Parodi RC; Castaldi A; Succi S
Radiol Med; 1995 Mar; 89(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 7754111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
