These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8498145)

  • 1. Quality control in cytologic screening.
    Cecchini S; Grazzini G; Bonardi R; Ciatto S
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(3):436. PubMed ID: 8498145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
    Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
    Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Re: the editorial in number 4, volume 28, 2008. "Cervical cancer control in Colombia: achievements and challenges of cytology based programs"].
    Calvache AE
    Biomedica; 2009 Mar; 29(1):161-2; author reply 162-3. PubMed ID: 19753849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Significance of sources of error and quality control in cytologic mass screening].
    Zimmer S; Krahnert U; Munck C
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1987; 109(4):209-17. PubMed ID: 3591056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Cervical cancer screening. False negative smears].
    Vassilakos P; De Marval F; Muñoz M
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Aug; 117(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 9340714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A reply on cervix cancer screening: cervical cytological test doesn't fulfil the requirements of a good screening test].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Sep; 97(37):4042. PubMed ID: 11036367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Screening of cervical cancer, false negative vaginal smears].
    Weintraub D
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1997 Nov; 117(11):921. PubMed ID: 9471658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance in cervical cytopathology.
    Light AM
    Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):290-2. PubMed ID: 9252748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality control in cytopathology applied to screening for cervical carcinoma.
    Marsan C
    Pol J Pathol; 1995; 46(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 8713292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality and liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear.
    Sirota RL
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Dec; 121(12):1237-8. PubMed ID: 9431309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [HPV test for quality control of gynecologic cytological tests].
    Wilander E; Wikström I
    Lakartidningen; 2008 Nov 26-Dec 9; 105(48-49):3560, 3564. PubMed ID: 19133586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rapid pre-screening of cervical smears as a method of internal quality control in a cervical screening programme.
    Tavares SB; de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
    Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 18476988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assessment in the age of machine-aided cervical cytology screening.
    Renshaw AA
    Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):345-7. PubMed ID: 15540251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shadow over the screen.
    Wilson M
    Nurs Times; 1987 Oct 28-Nov 4; 83(43):19-20. PubMed ID: 3697164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. European guidelines on cervical screening.
    Smith JH; Desai MS
    Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The impending loss of screening for cervix uteri carcinoma in the Netherlands].
    Lammes FB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Apr; 130(15):673-4. PubMed ID: 3703044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cervical smears taken by physicians' assistants are of lesser quality than smears taken by family physicians, but almost as good as the national average].
    van Rijswijk A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Feb; 144(8):399. PubMed ID: 10703599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Screening for cervix cancer--a successful program that should be improved].
    Andrae B; Strander B
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(35):3784-5. PubMed ID: 11016237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audit shows weaknesses in cervical cancer screening.
    Ferriman A
    BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7295):1141. PubMed ID: 11348903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Screening for cervix cancer--where are we going?].
    Kjaer SK
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 May; 162(21):3015. PubMed ID: 10850187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.