These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8498162)

  • 1. A comparison of Flow and Kodak dental X-ray films by means of perceptibility curves.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1993 Apr; 51(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 8498162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of a new dental X-ray film, Agfa Gevaert Dentus M4, with Kodak Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed dental X-ray films.
    Svenson B; Lindvall AM; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 8508944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective and subjective evaluations of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus dental x-ray film.
    Conover GL; Hildebolt CF; Anthony D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 7614190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A perceptibility curve comparison of Ultra-speed and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Tjelmeland EM; Moore WS; Hermesch CB; Buikema DJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):485-8. PubMed ID: 9574962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A laboratory evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray film.
    Horner K; Rushton VE; Shearer AC
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):359-63. PubMed ID: 8530727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sensitometric comparison of dental films of groups D and E.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Aug; 54(2):250-2. PubMed ID: 6956842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of Kodak Ultraspeed and Ektaspeed plus dental X-ray films for the detection of dental caries.
    Wong A; Monsour PA; Moule AJ; Basford KE
    Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 12035954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensitometric comparison of Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed Dental Films.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):114-6. PubMed ID: 7614149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kohout FJ; Nelson JF; Kienzle GC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jul; 58(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 6589567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two dental x-ray films compared for rater preference using endodontic views.
    Kleier DJ; Benner SJ; Averbach RE
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Feb; 59(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 3885130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film?
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Nilsson M
    Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychophysical properties of a new F-speed intraoral film.
    Mastoris M; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Tsiklakis K; Papadakis E; Li G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 15371315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of developer exhaustion on Kodak EKTASPEED Plus, Ektaspeed, and Ultra-speed dental films.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 7614150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sensitometric evaluation of a new E-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 8593905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitometric comparison of direct- and indirect-exposure films used in intraoral radiography.
    Hashimoto K; Thunthy KH; Iwai K; Ejima K; Weinberg R
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1992 Jun; 34(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 1500950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB; Platin E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.