408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8498222)
1. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: differences in blood flow impedance in benign and malignant lesions.
Hamper UM; Sheth S; Abbas FM; Rosenshein NB; Aronson D; Kurman RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1225-8. PubMed ID: 8498222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease.
Salem S; White LM; Lai J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1147-50. PubMed ID: 7976891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Color Doppler sonography of benign and malignant pulmonary masses.
Yuan A; Chang DB; Yu CJ; Kuo SH; Luh KT; Yang PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):545-9. PubMed ID: 8079841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler, and spectral Doppler sonography.
Stein SM; Laifer-Narin S; Johnson MB; Roman LD; Muderspach LI; Tyszka JM; Ralls PW
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):381-6. PubMed ID: 7839975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling: a new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; Mercé LT; García Manero M
J Ultrasound Med; 2005 May; 24(5):689-96. PubMed ID: 15840800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transvaginal color Doppler and CA125 as tools in the differential diagnosis of postmenopausal ovarian masses.
Botsis D; Kassanos D; Kalogirou D; Karakitsos P; Liapis A; Antoniou G
Maturitas; 1997 Apr; 26(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 9147352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Color Doppler blood flow measurements and microvessel density assessment in ovarian tumors].
Czekierdowski A; Szymański M; Szumiło J; Kotarski J
Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):695-700. PubMed ID: 14674110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography in the presurgical characterization of adnexal masses.
Caruso A; Caforio L; Testa AC; Ciampelli M; Panici PB; Mancuso S
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Nov; 63(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 8910625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings.
Jain KA
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8134599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sonography of ovarian masses: poor sensitivity of resistive index for identifying malignant lesions.
Levine D; Feldstein VA; Babcook CJ; Filly RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jun; 162(6):1355-9. PubMed ID: 8191998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complex adnexal mass in pregnancy: predictive value of color Doppler sonography.
Wheeler TC; Fleischer AC
J Ultrasound Med; 1997 Jun; 16(6):425-8. PubMed ID: 9315188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transvaginal color Doppler assessment of venous flow in adnexal masses.
Alcázar JL; López-García G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 May; 17(5):434-8. PubMed ID: 11380970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transvaginal ultrasonography of pelvic masses: evaluation of B-mode technique and Doppler ultrasonography.
Rehn M; Lohmann K; Rempen A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 8694082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography and conventional sonography in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses.
Reles A; Wein U; Lichtenegger W
J Clin Ultrasound; 1997 Jun; 25(5):217-25. PubMed ID: 9314102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography in adnexal masses: which parameter performs best?
Alcázar JL; Ruiz-Perez ML; Errasti T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Aug; 8(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 8883314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Doppler color-echo and flowmetric evaluations in ovarian tumors in postmenopausal patients].
de Albertis P; Serafini G; Cavallo A; Orio O; Gandolfo N; Quadri P
Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):488-92. PubMed ID: 8190933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone.
Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Hugol D; Hassen K; Sciot C; Truc JB; Poitout P; Vadrot D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8553953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of transvaginal color Doppler imaging and color Doppler energy for assessment of intraovarian blood flow.
Tailor A; Jurkovic D; Bourne TH; Natucci M; Collins WP; Campbell S
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Apr; 91(4):561-7. PubMed ID: 9540941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. E-flow doppler indices for prediction of benign and malignant ovarian tumors.
Tongsong T; Wanapirak C; Neeyalavira V; Khunamornpong S; Sukpan K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2009; 10(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 19469642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The power Doppler velocity index, pulsatility index, and resistive index can assist in making a differential diagnosis of primary ovarian carcinoma and Krukenberg tumors: a preliminary study.
Chen CY; Wu YC; Yen MS; Hung JH; Yuan CC; Chao KC
J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Jul; 26(7):921-6; quiz 927-9. PubMed ID: 17592055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
