These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8498696)

  • 1. Sputum quality: can you tell by looking?
    Flournoy DJ; Davidson LJ
    Am J Infect Control; 1993 Apr; 21(2):64-9. PubMed ID: 8498696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the quality of expectorated sputum for tuberculosis diagnosis in Bolivia.
    Hernández P; Punchak M; Camacho M; Hepple P; McNerney R
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2015 Sep; 19(9):1065-7. PubMed ID: 26260825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.
    Murray PR; Washington JA
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1975 Jun; 50(6):339-44. PubMed ID: 1127999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sampling variability in the microbiological evaluation of expectorated sputa and endotracheal aspirates.
    Nagendra S; Bourbeau P; Brecher S; Dunne M; LaRocco M; Doern G
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jun; 39(6):2344-7. PubMed ID: 11376088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of expectorated sputum for bacteriological analysis based on polymorphs and squamous epithelial cells: six-month study.
    Martin RS; Sumarah RK; Robart EM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Dec; 8(6):635-7. PubMed ID: 744796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of OMNIgene®•SPUTUM reagent versus cold-chain for the transportation of sputum samples to GeneXpert®MTB/RIF testing sites in Malawi.
    Alemayehu WA; Neri S; Dalebout S; Nalikungwi R; Trusov A; Ahmed E; Dimba A; Weirich A; Curry PS; Kelly-Cirino CD
    BMC Infect Dis; 2019 May; 19(1):424. PubMed ID: 31096945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of introducing quality control/quality assurance (QC/QA) guidelines in respiratory specimen processing.
    Al Balooshi N; Jamsheer A; Botta GA
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2003 Aug; 9(8):810-5. PubMed ID: 14616701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Realities of expectorated sputum collection in the pediatric cystic fibrosis clinic.
    Radhakrishnan DK; Corey M; Dell SD
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2007 Jun; 161(6):603-6. PubMed ID: 17548767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum collected on filter paper and stored at room temperature for 5 days by PCR assay and culture.
    Tansuphasiri U
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Aug; 84(8):1183-9. PubMed ID: 11758856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality evaluation of sputum specimens for mycobacterial culture.
    McCarter YS; Robinson A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 105(6):769-73. PubMed ID: 8659453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of sputum induction by hypertonic saline on specimen quality.
    Chuard C; Fracheboud D; Regamey C
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2001 Apr; 39(4):211-4. PubMed ID: 11404062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bacteriology of expectorated sputum with quantitative culture and wash technique compared to transtracheal aspirates.
    Bartlett JG; Finegold SM
    Am Rev Respir Dis; 1978 Jun; 117(6):1019-27. PubMed ID: 352206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact on clinical decision making of quality control standards applied to sputum analysis in COPD.
    Telgen MC; Brusse-Keizer MG; van der Valk PD; van der Palen J; Kerstjens HA; Hendrix MG
    Respir Med; 2011 Mar; 105(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 21093241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of 5 selection criteria for sputum as a valid sample for culture].
    Martín JE; Catalán P; Expósito C; Pérez MT; Domínguez J; Bisquert J
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1991 Dec; 9(10):603-7. PubMed ID: 1822149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ordering patterns, collection, transport, and screening of sputum cultures in a community hospital: evaluation of methods to improve results.
    Jacobson JT; Burke JP; Jacobson JA
    Infect Control; 1981; 2(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 6912218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of six different criteria for judging the acceptability of sputum specimens.
    Wong LK; Barry AL; Horgan SM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Oct; 16(4):627-31. PubMed ID: 7153311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Microbiological, macroscopic, and microscopic quality of sputum: current value of the study of their interrelationship].
    Rodríguez F; Tejada F
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1995 Mar; 13(3):194-5. PubMed ID: 7734508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bacterial sputum cultures. A clinician's viewpoint.
    Van Scoy RE
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1977 Jan; 52(1):39-41. PubMed ID: 344996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survey of outpatient sputum cytology: influence of written instructions on sample quality and who benefits from investigation.
    Tsang KW; Bentley AM; Mann JS; Belcher J; Pantin CF
    Qual Health Care; 1992 Mar; 1(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 10136830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory].
    Suzuki K; Higuchi T
    Kekkaku; 2007 Mar; 82(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 17444126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.