These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8498699)

  • 1. Evaluation of the vertical forces generated by the cervical biteplate facebow.
    Braun S; Johnson BE; Hnat WP; Gomez JA
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 8498699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric comparison of maxillary second molar extraction and nonextraction treatments in patients with Class II malocclusions.
    Waters D; Harris EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):608-13; quiz 677. PubMed ID: 11742305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skeletal and dental changes with nonextraction Begg mechanotherapy in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Reddy P; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):641-8. PubMed ID: 11113799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified Twin Blocks: fabrication method and use in a child with a Class II malocclusion.
    Yang KH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 20(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 8634204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic functional force measurements on an anterior bite plane during the night.
    Wichelhaus A; Hüffmeier S; Sander FG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2003 Nov; 64(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 14628133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Realities of craniofacial growth modification.
    Kluemper GT; Spalding PM
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2001 Mar; 9(1):23-51. PubMed ID: 11905336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A modification of the twin block technique for patients with a deep bite.
    Mahony DR; Witzig J
    Funct Orthod; 1999; 16(2):4-8, 10. PubMed ID: 10613126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Orthodontic intervention in the early mixed dentition: a prospective, controlled study on the effects of the eruption guidance appliance.
    Keski-Nisula K; Hernesniemi R; Heiskanen M; Keski-Nisula L; Varrela J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):254-60; quiz 328.e2. PubMed ID: 18249292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthopedic cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in class II correction.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T; Hurmerinta K; Haavikko K
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 10961782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.
    Covell DA; Trammell DW; Boero RP; West R
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 10456598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maxillary expansion in Class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study.
    Kirjavainen M; Kirjavainen T
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 12828436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of vertical chincap therapy on the mandibular morphology in open-bite patients.
    Işcan HN; Dinçer M; Gültan A; Meral O; Taner-Sarisoy L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 12439479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distal movement of the maxillary molar using an active removable appliance and extraoral force: a case report.
    Johnson BE
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8190880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate.
    Chung KR; Kook YA; Kim SH; Mo SS; Jung JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 18174081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
    Falk H
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treating Class II patients with removable plates and functional orthopedic appliances-the importance of anterior tooth inclination and direction of growth on treatment outcome.
    Hönn M; Schneider C; Dietz K; Godt A; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Jul; 67(4):272-88. PubMed ID: 16838095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The effects on upper first molars by the face-bow construction. Consideration of utilizing the strain gauge method and the computer method of structural analysis].
    Nakamura R
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Apr; 48(2):246-66. PubMed ID: 2632655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.