These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 849944)

  • 1. Cervical orthoses. A study comparing their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects.
    Johnson RM; Hart DL; Simmons EF; Ramsby GR; Southwick WO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1977 Apr; 59(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 849944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The yale cervical orthosis: an evaluation of its effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects and a comparison with other cervical orthoses.
    Johnson RM; Hart DL; Owen JR; Lerner E; Chapin W; Zeleznik R
    Phys Ther; 1978 Jul; 58(7):865-71. PubMed ID: 662928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction in head and intervertebral motion provided by 7 contemporary cervical orthoses in 45 individuals.
    Schneider AM; Hipp JA; Nguyen L; Reitman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 17202874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cineradiography of the braced normal cervical spine. A comparative study of five commonly used cervical orthoses.
    Hartman JT; Palumbo F; Hill BJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1975; (109):97-102. PubMed ID: 1132211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of Adjustable Cervical Orthoses and Modular Cervical Thoracic Orthoses in Restricting Neck Motion: A Comparative In vivo Biomechanical Study.
    Gao F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(19):E1046-51. PubMed ID: 26076435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Minerva cervicothoracic orthosis.
    Sharpe KP; Rao S; Ziogas A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(13):1475-9. PubMed ID: 8623066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. A comparison study.
    Askins V; Eismont FJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1193-8. PubMed ID: 9201855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of orthoses on three-dimensional load-displacement properties of the cervical spine.
    Ivancic PC
    Eur Spine J; 2013 Jan; 22(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 23090094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neck motion due to the halo-vest in prone and supine positions.
    Ivancic PC; Telles CJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E400-6. PubMed ID: 20118835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of halo-vest length on stability of the cervical spine. A study in normal subjects.
    Wang GJ; Moskal JT; Albert T; Pritts C; Schuch CM; Stamp WG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Mar; 70(3):357-60. PubMed ID: 3346262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical analysis of cervical orthoses in flexion and extension: a comparison of cervical collars and cervical thoracic orthoses.
    Gavin TM; Carandang G; Havey R; Flanagan P; Ghanayem A; Patwardhan AG
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(6):527-37. PubMed ID: 15077665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical orthoses effect on cervical spine motion: roentgenographic and goniometric method of study.
    Fisher SV; Bowar JF; Awad EA; Gullickson G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1977 Mar; 58(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 843201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The halo vest: an evaluation of motion and forces across the neck.
    Koch RA; Nickel VL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1978 Jun; 3(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 663758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of halo-vest components on stabilizing the injured cervical spine.
    Ivancic PC; Beauchman NN; Tweardy L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 19139667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Manual fixation versus locking during upper cervical segmental mobilization. Part 2: an in vitro three-dimensional arthrokinematic analysis of manual axial rotation and lateral bending mobilization of the atlanto-axial joint.
    Cattrysse E; Baeyens JP; Clarys JP; Van Roy P
    Man Ther; 2007 Nov; 12(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 17189711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization.
    Chandler DR; Nemejc C; Adkins RH; Waters RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1185-8. PubMed ID: 1416294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.