These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8499790)

  • 1. Critical appraisal of review articles.
    Hutchison BG
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 May; 39():1097-102. PubMed ID: 8499790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Document research and self-instruction. Critical reading of a medical article--Practice guidelines--Orphan diseases. Part 3--Critical reading of a medical article. Practice guidelines].
    Chabot JM
    Rev Prat; 2005 Jun; 55(11):1229-34. PubMed ID: 16164071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Practice guidelines: what the family physician should know.
    Woolf SH
    Am Fam Physician; 1995 May; 51(6):1455-63. PubMed ID: 7732947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing guidelines for use in family practice.
    Rosser WW; Davis D; Gilbart E;
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Nov; 50(11):969-73. PubMed ID: 11711013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The gap between research and practice--a survey among participants in continuing medical education events].
    Icsezer S; Linde K
    Forsch Komplementmed; 2008 Oct; 15(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 19001823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidelines for CME need revamping.
    Dean M
    Can Fam Physician; 1996 Jul; 42():1295-7. PubMed ID: 8754697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Taking critical appraisal to extremes. The need for balance in the evaluation of evidence.
    Woolf SH
    J Fam Pract; 2000 Dec; 49(12):1081-5. PubMed ID: 11132056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews.
    Bender R; Bunce C; Clarke M; Gates S; Lange S; Pace NL; Thorlund K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):857-65. PubMed ID: 18687287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to write an evidence-based clinical review article.
    Siwek J; Gourlay ML; Slawson DC; Shaughnessy AF
    Am Fam Physician; 2002 Jan; 65(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 11820489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An introduction to an evidence-based approach to interventional techniques in the management of chronic spinal pain.
    Manchikanti L; Singh V; Helm S; Schultz DM; Datta S; Hirsch JA;
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(4):E1-33. PubMed ID: 19668280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Building the powerful 10-minute office visit: Part II. Beginning a critical literature review.
    Neely JG; Hartman JM; Wallace MS
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 11192902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Neely JG; Magit AE; Rich JT; Voelker CC; Wang EW; Paniello RC; Nussenbaum B; Bradley JP
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Jan; 142(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 20096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of systematic reviews of therapy trials.
    Scott I; Greenberg P; Poole P; Campbell D
    Intern Med J; 2006 Sep; 36(9):587-99. PubMed ID: 16911551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
    Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further statistics in dentistry Part 8: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Jan; 194(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 12577072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
    Tseng TY; Dahm P; Poolman RW; Preminger GM; Canales BJ; Montori VM
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1249-56. PubMed ID: 18707741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How are the experiences and needs of families of individuals with mental illness reflected in medical education guidelines?
    Riebschleger J; Scheid J; Luz C; Mickus M; Liszewski C; Eaton M
    Acad Psychiatry; 2008; 32(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 18349331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [How to improve continuing education and quality improvement in general practice?].
    Flottorp S; Bjerkeland E; Baerheim A; Forland F; Forsgren B; Hagerup J; Haavet OR; Malde K; Maartmann-Moe K; Nicolaisen M; Prestegaard K; Thesen J; Vinje L
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Mar; 125(5):601-2. PubMed ID: 15776036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.