These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8499806)

  • 1. The cutting edge. 104 hospitals with the highest cesarean section rates (37% and over).
    Birth Gaz; 1993; 9(2):38-9. PubMed ID: 8499806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical case mix adjustment of cesarean delivery rates in U.S. military hospitals, 2002.
    Linton A; Peterson MR; Williams TV
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 15738031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Elective cesarean section during delivery and emergency. Interrelations among different indicators].
    Lazarov L; Todorov I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2000; 40(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 11288624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Births attended by certified nurse-midwives in the United States in 2005.
    Declercq E
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(1):95-6. PubMed ID: 19114252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carol Sakala's letter from North America: an uncontrolled experiment: elective delivery predominates in the United States.
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 17190018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survival rates and mode of delivery for vertex preterm neonates according to small- or appropriate-for-gestational-age status.
    Lee HC; Gould JB
    Pediatrics; 2006 Dec; 118(6):e1836-44. PubMed ID: 17142505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pregnancy and delivery in 2 Roman hospitals].
    Ballacci F; Farchi S; Pinnelli A
    Epidemiol Prev; 1996; 20(2-3):107-9. PubMed ID: 8766290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. State variation in rates of cesarean and VBAC delivery: 1989 and 1993.
    Clarke SC; Taffel SM
    Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1996; 77(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 8744893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obstetricians' and midwives' attitudes toward cesarean section.
    Monari F; Di Mario S; Facchinetti F; Basevi V
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 18507584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section?
    Heinberg EM; Wood RA; Chambers RB
    J Reprod Med; 2002 May; 47(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 12063879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stratified rates of cesarean sections and spontaneous vaginal deliveries. Data from five labor wards in Denmark--1996.
    Rasmussen OB; Pedersen BL; Wilken-Jensen C; Vejerslev LO
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 10716305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted breech delivery, is the art fading?
    Akinola SE; Archibong EI; Bhawani KP; Sobande AA
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Apr; 23(4):423-6. PubMed ID: 11953768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate.
    Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E
    Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Occupation and risk of cesarean section: study based on the perinatal survey of Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
    Simoes E; Kunz S; Bosing-Schwenkglenks M; Schmahl FW
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Apr; 271(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 15083307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability of risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates over time.
    Bailit JL; Garrett JM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 190(2):395-400. PubMed ID: 14981380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Will there ever be an end to the Caesarean section rate debate?
    Dietz HP; Peek MJ
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 44(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 15089831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Secular trends in cesarean delivery rates among macrosomic deliveries in the United States, 1989 to 2002.
    Boulet SL; Alexander GR; Salihu HM
    J Perinatol; 2005 Sep; 25(9):569-76. PubMed ID: 16079908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.