These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

316 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8501429)

  • 1. Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.
    Trueswell JC; Tanenhaus MK; Kello C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 May; 19(3):528-53. PubMed ID: 8501429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing.
    Schmauder AR; Egan MC
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Nov; 26(6):1304-12. PubMed ID: 9847553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.
    Kennison SM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 11340858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Plausibility and verb subeategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading.
    Traxler MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2005 Jan; 34(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 15968918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thematic roles in sentence parsing.
    Clifton C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1993 Jun; 47(2):222-46. PubMed ID: 8364531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: number of complements, subcategorization, and thematic frames.
    Shetreet E; Palti D; Friedmann N; Hadar U
    Cereb Cortex; 2007 Aug; 17(8):1958-69. PubMed ID: 17101687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The on-line resolution of the sentence complement/relative clause ambiguity: evidence from Spanish.
    Demestre J; García-Albea JE
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 14959507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all.
    Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):550-69. PubMed ID: 17470005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utilization of prosodic information in syntactic ambiguity resolution.
    Dede G
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2010 Aug; 39(4):345-74. PubMed ID: 20033849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can we separate verbs from their argument structure? A group study in aphasia.
    Caley S; Whitworth A; Claessen M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Jan; 52(1):59-70. PubMed ID: 27296470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of factivity on lexical retrieval and postlexical processes during eye fixations in reading.
    Inhoff AW
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1985 Jan; 14(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 3973836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do verb bias effects on sentence production reflect sensitivity to comprehension or production factors?
    Ferreira VS; Schotter ER
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Aug; 66(8):1548-71. PubMed ID: 23286581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A constraint-based lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference.
    Juliano C; Tanenhaus MK
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1994 Nov; 23(6):459-71. PubMed ID: 7996507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical projection and the interaction of syntax and semantics in parsing.
    Boland JE; Tanenhaus MK; Carlson G; Garnsey SM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1989 Nov; 18(6):563-76. PubMed ID: 2632799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints.
    Spivey-Knowlton M; Sedivy JC
    Cognition; 1995 Jun; 55(3):227-67. PubMed ID: 7634760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic facilitation of lexical access during sentence processing.
    Duffy SA; Henderson JM; Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Sep; 15(5):791-801. PubMed ID: 2528603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.
    Mohamed MT; Clifton C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1797-820. PubMed ID: 21722057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proactive interference effects on sentence production.
    Ferreira VS; Firato CE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Dec; 9(4):795-800. PubMed ID: 12613685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.
    Tooley KM; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 19210079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.