These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8503964)

  • 41. Birth centers. Economy, safety, and empowerment.
    Spitzer MC
    J Nurse Midwifery; 1995; 40(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 7674056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Satisfaction with perinatal care in Vysočina region in the period between October 2013 and September 2014].
    Takács L; Seidlerová JM; Smolík F; Hoskovcová S; Antonín P; Vařáková J; Valová A; Svoboda T; Dočkalová J
    Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Dec; 80(6):426-35. PubMed ID: 26741157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Gaining insight into how women conceptualize satisfaction: Western Australian women's perception of their maternity care experiences.
    Lewis L; Hauck YL; Ronchi F; Crichton C; Waller L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Feb; 16():29. PubMed ID: 26846257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cruelty in the maternity wards revisited.
    Goer H
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2003; (67):30. PubMed ID: 14596099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A population based study of Swedish women's opinions about antenatal, delivery and postpartum care.
    Ladfors L; Eriksson M; Mattsson LA; Kylebäck K; Magnusson L; Milsom I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2001 Feb; 80(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 11167207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Home-like versus conventional institutional settings for birth.
    Hodnett ED
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000012. PubMed ID: 10796083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and the Netherlands.
    Christiaens W; Bracke P
    Midwifery; 2009 Apr; 25(2):e11-9. PubMed ID: 17512100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Characteristics, interventions, and outcomes of women who used a birthing pool: a prospective observational study.
    Burns EE; Boulton MG; Cluett E; Cornelius VR; Smith LA
    Birth; 2012 Sep; 39(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 23281901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Intrapartum and postpartum care in Sweden: women's opinions and risk factors for not being satisfied.
    Waldenström U; Rudman A; Hildingsson I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 16752233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Swedish women's interest in models of midwifery care - Time to consider the system? A prospective longitudinal survey.
    Hildingsson I; Karlström A; Haines H; Johansson M
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2016 Mar; 7():27-32. PubMed ID: 26826042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. 'Not enough people to look after you': an exploration of women's experiences of childbirth in the Republic of Ireland.
    Larkin P; Begley CM; Devane D
    Midwifery; 2012 Feb; 28(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 21237541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Are stipulated requirements for the quality of maternity care complied with?
    Johansen LT; Pay ASD; Broen L; Roland B; Øian P
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2017 Sep; 137(17):. PubMed ID: 28925199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Experiencing care in the birthing center context: the users' perspective].
    Gonçalves R; de Azevedo Aguiar C; Merighi MA; de Jesus MC
    Rev Esc Enferm USP; 2011 Mar; 45(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 21445490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Behind the myth--few women prefer caesarean section in the absence of medical or obstetrical factors.
    Karlström A; Nystedt A; Johansson M; Hildingsson I
    Midwifery; 2011 Oct; 27(5):620-7. PubMed ID: 20630634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Can deliveries at risk be selected at smaller delivery units?].
    Holt J; Vold IN
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Mar; 118(8):1218-20. PubMed ID: 9567699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Differences in optimality index between planned place of birth in a birth centre and alternative planned places of birth, a nationwide prospective cohort study in The Netherlands: results of the Dutch Birth Centre Study.
    Hermus MAA; Hitzert M; Boesveld IC; van den Akker-van Marle ME; Dommelen PV; Franx A; Graaf JP; Lith JMMV; Luurssen-Masurel N; Steegers EAP; Wiegers TA; Bruin KMVP
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e016958. PubMed ID: 29150465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Autonomous and dependent-The dichotomy of birth: A feminist analysis of birth plans in Sweden.
    Westergren A; Edin K; Walsh D; Christianson M
    Midwifery; 2019 Jan; 68():56-64. PubMed ID: 30366225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. South Australian rural women's views of their pregnancy, birthing and postnatal care.
    Guest ML; Stamp GE
    Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(3):1101. PubMed ID: 19621980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.
    Christensen LF; Overgaard C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Jan; 17(1):14. PubMed ID: 28068929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Caseload midwifery for women with fear of birth is a feasible option.
    Hildingsson I; Rubertsson C; Karlström A; Haines H
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():50-55. PubMed ID: 29804775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.