These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 850428)
21. Immediate and late results of aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve. Larsen A; Sivertsen E; Semb G Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 152973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term results with the Biocor-SJM stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. Vrandecic M; Fantini FA; Filho BG; de O; da C; Vrandecic E J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 11843505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Indexed effective orifice area after mechanical aortic valve replacement does not affect left ventricular mass regression in elderly. Roscitano A; Benedetto U; Sciangula A; Merico E; Barberi F; Bianchini R; Tonelli E; Sinatra R Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Feb; 29(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 16376565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis. Seitelberger R; Bialy J; Gottardi R; Seebacher G; Moidl R; Mittelböck M; Simon P; Wolner E Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 15019661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Hemodynamic assessment of the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position. Nardi C; Scioti G; Milano AD; De Carlo M; Bortolotti U J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 11206755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative analysis of left ventricular hemodynamics and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement with homografts or mechanical valves. Basarir S; Islamoglu F; Ozkisacik E; Atay Y; Boga M; Bakalim T; Ozbaran M; Telli A J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 10678375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Indication for patch enlargement of the small aortic annulus during aortic valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve]. Nakano S; Hirose H; Matsuda H; Shirakura R; Sato S; Sakakibara T; Taniguchi K; Kawashima Y; Kawachi K; Mori T Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jan; 33(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 3998530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Intermediate results of aortic valve replacement using 19 mm bioprosthetic valve]. Funatsu T; Takeuchi M; Masai T; Fukuda H Kyobu Geka; 2006 Sep; 59(10):904-8. PubMed ID: 16986685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Early clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the aortic intact porcine bioprosthesis. Mullany CJ; Schaff HV; Orszulak TA; Miller FA J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Nov; 3(6):641-7. PubMed ID: 8000607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans. Kleine P; Hasenkam MJ; Nygaard H; Perthel M; Wesemeyer D; Laas J J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):308-11; discussion 311-2. PubMed ID: 10772054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hemodynamic performance of the Edwards Prima stentless valve. Konertz W J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):441-2. PubMed ID: 9263879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Surgical treatment of combined aortic and mitral valvular disease. A clinical, haemodynamic and experimental evaluation of the standard and convexo-concave models of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Aberg B Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl; 1980; Suppl 25():1-60. PubMed ID: 6933689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular size and function in patients before and after aortic valve replacement (author's transl)]. Köhler E; Völz G; Haerten K; Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1981 Sep; 70(9):660-9. PubMed ID: 7303804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Hemodynamic plus series of St. Jude medical valve prosthesis in aortic position: early clinical outcome and reconsideration of its application]. Katsumata T; Kitamura M; Tsuchida K; Hachida M; Endo M; Hashimoto A; Koyanagi H Kyobu Geka; 1996 Mar; 49(3):194-8. PubMed ID: 8709423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Natural history of chronic aortic valve. Significance of hemodynamic findings (author's transl)]. Schwarz F; Schafft H; Federlin K; Kübler W Z Kardiol; 1981 Mar; 70(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 7234049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diastolic function in aortic valve disease: techniques of evaluation and pre-/postoperative changes. Hess OM; Ritter M; Schneider J; Grimm J; Turina M; Krayenbuehl HP Herz; 1984 Oct; 9(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 6500482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of the 21-mm Björk-Shiley Monostrut valve in patients with a narrow aortic root. Hashimoto K; Mashiko K; Nakano M; Horikoshi S; Kurosawa H; Arai T Cardiovasc Surg; 1994 Aug; 2(4):456-9. PubMed ID: 7953447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Hall-Kaster disc valve prosthesis: clinical and hemodynamic observations in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Semb BK; Nitter-Hauge S; Hall KV J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1980; 21(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 7419556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The influence of ventricular function on the results of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Taw RL; Pipkin R; Fortuin NJ; Brawley RK Johns Hopkins Med J; 1976 Sep; 139(3):85-91. PubMed ID: 972440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]