These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8505245)

  • 1. The contribution of progeny of uncertain paternity to the accuracy of sire evaluation.
    Famula TR
    J Anim Sci; 1993 May; 71(5):1136-41. PubMed ID: 8505245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA-based paternity analysis and genetic evaluation in a large, commercial cattle ranch setting.
    Van Eenennaam AL; Weaber RL; Drake DJ; Penedo MC; Quaas RL; Garrick DJ; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3159-69. PubMed ID: 17878282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
    Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simple and rapid inversion of additive relationship matrices incorporating parental uncertainty.
    Famula TR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1045-8. PubMed ID: 1582933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of data structure on variance of prediction error and accuracy of genetic evaluation.
    Tosh JJ; Wilton JW
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Oct; 72(10):2568-77. PubMed ID: 7883613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
    Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling pedigree accuracy and uncertain parentage in single-step genomic evaluations of simulated and US Holstein datasets.
    Bradford HL; Masuda Y; Cole JB; Misztal I; VanRaden PM
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Mar; 102(3):2308-2318. PubMed ID: 30639024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Method for the estimation of genetic merit of animals with uncertain paternity under Bayesian inference.
    Shiotsuki L; Cardoso FF; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Apr; 135(2):116-123. PubMed ID: 29575105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of a genetic group and unknown paternity models for growth traits in Nellore cattle.
    Shiotsuki L; Cardoso FF; Silva JA; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5135-43. PubMed ID: 24045494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic and economic effects of the increase in female paternal filiations by parentage assignment in sheep and goat breeding programs.
    Raoul J; Palhière I; Astruc JM; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3663-3683. PubMed ID: 27898915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimations of the efficacy and reliability of paternity assignments from DNA microsatellite analysis of multiple-sire matings.
    Vankan DM; Faddy MJ
    Anim Genet; 1999 Oct; 30(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 10582280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of accounting for different phenotypic variances by sire breed and sex on selection of sires based on expected progeny differences for 200- and 365-day weights.
    Rodríguez-Almeida FA; Van Vleck LD; Cundiff LV
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Sep; 73(9):2589-99. PubMed ID: 8582848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Threshold model analysis of dystocia in dairy cattle when progeny information is limited.
    Clutter AC; Berger PJ; Mattison JM
    J Dairy Sci; 1989 Dec; 72(12):3264-72. PubMed ID: 2628446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic evaluation for length of productive life with censored records.
    Vukasinovic N; Moll J; Künzi N
    J Dairy Sci; 1999 Oct; 82(10):2178-85. PubMed ID: 10531604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting incorrect paternity assignment in the Israeli Holstein population.
    Weller JI; Feldmesser E; Golik M; Tager-Cohen I; Domochovsky R; Alus O; Ezra E; Ron M
    J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2627-40. PubMed ID: 15328288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring unknown genotypes of sires at codominant deoxyribonucleic acid markers in half-sib families.
    Gomez-Raya L
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Jun; 87(6):1872-82. PubMed ID: 19251934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Strategy To Exploit Surrogate Sire Technology in Livestock Breeding Programs.
    Gottardo P; Gorjanc G; Battagin M; Gaynor RC; Jenko J; Ros-Freixedes R; Bruce A Whitelaw C; Mileham AJ; Herring WO; Hickey JM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Jan; 9(1):203-215. PubMed ID: 30563834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adapting best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for timely genetic evaluation: II. Progeny traits in multiple contemporary groups within a herd.
    Lofgren DL; Harris DL; Stewart TS; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3223-42. PubMed ID: 2613571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adapting best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for timely genetic evaluation: I. Progeny traits in a single contemporary group for each sex.
    Harris DL; Lofgren DL; Stewart TS; Schinckel AP
    J Anim Sci; 1989 Dec; 67(12):3209-22. PubMed ID: 2613570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal contemporary group structure to maximize genetic progress through genetic evaluation of swine.
    Lofgren DL; Stewart TS
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Sep; 72(9):2254-9. PubMed ID: 8002444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.